Andre Oppermann wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
P.S. I'm working on making protocols within protocols domains loadable at
least for IPv4.
I did some work on this once.. things have got a lot more complicated
however with locking..
Actually there are not tha
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >
> >P.S. I'm working on making protocols within protocols domains loadable at
> >least for IPv4.
> >
> I did some work on this once.. things have got a lot more complicated
> however with locking..
Actually there are not that many locking probl
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 08:01:46PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > any objections about commiting this improvement to tun(4)?
A> > In my ng_device I have a similar function ngdwrite(), which was
A> > cut-n-pasted from tunwrite(). And my tests wit
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 08:01:46PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> A> > any objections about commiting this improvement to tun(4)?
> A> > In my ng_device I have a similar function ngdwrite(), which was
> A> > cut-n-pasted from tunwrite(). And my tests with a patched ng_d
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 08:01:46PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > any objections about commiting this improvement to tun(4)?
A> > In my ng_device I have a similar function ngdwrite(), which was
A> > cut-n-pasted from tunwrite(). And my tests with a patched ng_device have
A> > shown 30% speedu
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 08:01:49AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 05:44:57PM +0400, Grigory Klyuchnikov wrote:
> > How can a user process get IPv6 multicast addresses of ethernet
> > interfaces? I have FreeBSD 5.2.1 and get interface addresses
> > via ioctl(SIOCGIFCONF) or sys
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> Collegues,
>
> any objections about commiting this improvement to tun(4)?
> In my ng_device I have a similar function ngdwrite(), which was
> cut-n-pasted from tunwrite(). And my tests with a patched ng_device have
> shown 30% speedup on large writes. I don't think it
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> Collegues,
>
> any objections about commiting this improvement to tun(4)?
> In my ng_device I have a similar function ngdwrite(), which was
> cut-n-pasted from tunwrite(). And my tests with a patched ng_device have
> shown 30% speedup on large writes. I don't think it
Collegues,
any objections about commiting this improvement to tun(4)?
In my ng_device I have a similar function ngdwrite(), which was
cut-n-pasted from tunwrite(). And my tests with a patched ng_device have
shown 30% speedup on large writes. I don't think it will help tun(4)
to be a much faste
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Stephane Raimbault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Error 49, socket problem?
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:46:58 +0900
At Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:36:03 -0600,
Stephane Raimbault wrote:
>
> I doubt it's a DoS attack, however it could very well be.
>
Well
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 05:44:57PM +0400, Grigory Klyuchnikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How can a user process get IPv6 multicast addresses of ethernet
> interfaces? I have FreeBSD 5.2.1 and get interface addresses
> via ioctl(SIOCGIFCONF) or sysctl(witch NET_RT_IFLIST),
> but all returned addresses are
Hello,
How can a user process get IPv6 multicast addresses of ethernet
interfaces? I have FreeBSD 5.2.1 and get interface addresses
via ioctl(SIOCGIFCONF) or sysctl(witch NET_RT_IFLIST),
but all returned addresses are unicast.
In net/if.h there is a struct ifma_msghdr:
/*
* Message format for use
Synopsis: After deletion of an IPv6 alias, the route to the whole subnet is removed
too.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Responsible-Changed-By: gnn
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Oct 14 11:34:13 GMT 2004
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Took responsibility for patching and te
13 matches
Mail list logo
