Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > Collegues, > > any objections about commiting this improvement to tun(4)? > In my ng_device I have a similar function ngdwrite(), which was > cut-n-pasted from tunwrite(). And my tests with a patched ng_device have > shown 30% speedup on large writes. I don't think it will help tun(4) > to be a much faster, since tunwrite() isn't a bottleneck, but I think > it is worth considering. The patch was tested on a production PPPoE access > concentrator (RELENG_4 however).
Looks good! Nice optimization, long overdue. ;-) -- Andre _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
