On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:40:38PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 08:39:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> K> This might be related to SACK, which is one of the situations where we
> K> loop back to the again label, but that's just a guess.
>
> Does it panics with net.inet.t
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> pointyhat (SMP machine running RELENG_5) has twice in the past 2 days
> gone into an infinite loop in the tcp_output() function (repeatedly
> breaking into DDB and continuing, I can see it at different points in
> the code). I made tcp_output keep a cou
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 08:39:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
K> This might be related to SACK, which is one of the situations where we
K> loop back to the again label, but that's just a guess.
Does it panics with net.inet.tcp.sack.enable=0 ?
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
_
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:34:34AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 06:15:15PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> G> In ether_input() we unconditionaly discard the mbufs whose m_len is less than
> G> ETHER_HDR_LEN. A bit higher M_PKTHDR has been checked but the check made
> G>
