On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:40:38PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 08:39:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > K> This might be related to SACK, which is one of the situations where we > K> loop back to the again label, but that's just a guess. > > Does it panics with net.inet.tcp.sack.enable=0 ?
Trying that now..it's been up overnight but not heavily loaded yet. Kris
pgpz4dCg1YJCM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
