Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE

2004-06-17 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > I was going to suggest vmstat now that sfbufs are used for so many > > other things than just "sendfile bufs". > > > > -- > > - Alfred Perlstein > > How about if we do this: > > 5.x: List sfbufs both

Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE

2004-06-17 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Alfred Perlstein wrote: I was going to suggest vmstat now that sfbufs are used for so many other things than just "sendfile bufs". -- - Alfred Perlstein How about if we do this: 5.x: List sfbufs both in vmstat _and_ in netstat -m, as their status is relevant to both network a

Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE

2004-06-17 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040617 23:20] wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I read objections in cvs-all@ about netstat's output after MFC > >of sendfile(2) statistics. > > > >How about "netstat -ms" ? > > > >Right now this switch combination is treated

Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE

2004-06-17 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Igor Sysoev wrote: Hi, I read objections in cvs-all@ about netstat's output after MFC of sendfile(2) statistics. How about "netstat -ms" ? Right now this switch combination is treated as simple "-m" in both -STABLE and -CURRENT. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/ I would prefer t

Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE

2004-06-17 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040617 22:52] wrote: > Hi, > > I read objections in cvs-all@ about netstat's output after MFC > of sendfile(2) statistics. > > How about "netstat -ms" ? > > Right now this switch combination is treated as simple "-m" in both -STABLE > and -CURRENT. I would lov

"netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE

2004-06-17 Thread Igor Sysoev
Hi, I read objections in cvs-all@ about netstat's output after MFC of sendfile(2) statistics. How about "netstat -ms" ? Right now this switch combination is treated as simple "-m" in both -STABLE and -CURRENT. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/ ___ [EM

update to 4.10 via ssh

2004-06-17 Thread Nicolás de Bari Embríz G . R .
Hi all, right now I am using freebsd 4.9 but I would like to update to 4.10-STABLE but I have a problem, I want to do this on a dedicated server the one is in another country and miles away from me, so I am planing to do this over ssh. what I plan to do is a cvsup to get the latest release then:

Re: Intel 10GbE Driver committed

2004-06-17 Thread Andre Oppermann
Petri Helenius wrote: > > ming fu wrote: > > > Does this one replace the em driver? > > > > > It does not. However as far as I understand the semantics of the chips > aren´t that much different so I wonder why another driver instead of > adding to em. >From reading both drivers it seems the 10Gb

Re: Intel 10GbE Driver committed

2004-06-17 Thread Petri Helenius
ming fu wrote: Does this one replace the em driver? It does not. However as far as I understand the semantics of the chips aren´t that much different so I wonder why another driver instead of adding to em. Pete ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http:

Mpd-4.0b2 available

2004-06-17 Thread Michael Bretterklieber
Hi, I just released Mpd-4.0b2, this release fixes a bad bug (and some others) wich caused Mpd-4 to be dead-locked. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/mpd/mpd-4.0b2.tar.gz?download It would be great, if some of you could help testing Mpd-4. bye, -- --- -

Re: Intel 10GbE Driver committed

2004-06-17 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Tony Ackerman wrote: > We have commited the ixgb(4) driver for Intel(R) PRO/10GbE Server > Adapters to -current and -stable. Tony, When I took a look at the ixgb driver a couple of weeks ago, it looked like there was currently no locking in the driver to allow it to execut

Re: IPFW questions

2004-06-17 Thread James
natd is a daemon userland process which performs way poorly than a kernel process. its fine for small office/home use, but definately not at the traffic level you are pushing. you can consider using ipnat (kldload ipl.ko; man -a ipnat) for NAT rules, and use ipfw for rest of packet filtering. hop

Re: Intel 10GbE Driver committed

2004-06-17 Thread ming fu
Does this one replace the em driver? Tony Ackerman wrote: We have commited the ixgb(4) driver for Intel(R) PRO/10GbE Server Adapters to -current and -stable. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsu

Intel 10GbE Driver committed

2004-06-17 Thread Tony Ackerman
We have commited the ixgb(4) driver for Intel(R) PRO/10GbE Server Adapters to -current and -stable. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Asterisk on FreeBSD

2004-06-17 Thread AK
Hello, ereyone! I have just installed Asterix on my FreeBSD (-current) box I'm planning to use it as H323 PBX for softphones Currently I'm stuck in transfering a call to another machine running H323 client When I define forwarding address as H323/ip$192.168.1.77|20|r Asterisk will crash immedi