On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > I was going to suggest vmstat now that sfbufs are used for so many > > other things than just "sendfile bufs". > > > > -- > > - Alfred Perlstein > > How about if we do this: > > 5.x: List sfbufs both in vmstat _and_ in netstat -m, as their status is > relevant to both network and general memory usage. > > 4.x: MFC the vmstat implementation. > > This would preserve 4.x's behavior, but allow 5.x users (who have a new > netstat -m output format anyway) to see sfbuf information without invocing > multiple utilities.
In 4.x sfbufs are network buffers only and I think it's handy to see the network buffer statistics in one place. I prefer to see netstat -ms or netstat -m. And nothing against additional the vmstat implementation. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
