Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:31:18PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: > R> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: > R> >R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse > R> >R> >type. > R> >R> > > R> >R> H

Re: NDIS: How can I help with these (2nd request).

--On Friday, May 28, 2004 22:51:19 -0500 Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 28 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote: I E-mailed you (Silby) the driver. You should also be able to use ports/archivers/cabextract to pull stuff from the cab's. LER Neat, I didn't know we had that util in p

Re: NDIS: How can I help with these (2nd request).

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote: > I E-mailed you (Silby) the driver. You should also be able to use > ports/archivers/cabextract to pull stuff from the cab's. > > LER Neat, I didn't know we had that util in ports. I tried it on the cabs, and it told me to use "unshield", which was a

Re: NDIS: How can I help with these (2nd request).

--On Friday, May 28, 2004 20:31:01 -0500 Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 28 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Second, have you tried various versions of the windows drivers for the > card? Maybe different versions of the driver have different bugs. :) There is only one versio

Re: NDIS: How can I help with these (2nd request).

--On Friday, May 28, 2004 20:31:01 -0500 Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 28 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Second, have you tried various versions of the windows drivers for the > card? Maybe different versions of the driver have different bugs. :) There is only one versio

Re: NDIS: How can I help with these (2nd request).

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > Second, have you tried various versions of the windows drivers for the > > card? Maybe different versions of the driver have different bugs. :) > There is only one version for this card, it's relatively new. I think that since it supports 98/me/2K/

Re: NDIS: How can I help with these (2nd request).

--On Friday, May 28, 2004 18:19:36 -0500 Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 28 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote: I have a LinkSys WPC54GS PCCARD Wireless card, and am using the NDISulator to use the windows driver. I get the following when transferring large files: lerlaptop# tail

Re: NDIS: How can I help with these (2nd request).

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote: > I have a LinkSys WPC54GS PCCARD Wireless card, and am using the NDISulator > to use the windows driver. > > I get the following when transferring large files: > > lerlaptop# tail /var/log/messages > May 28 08:37:47 lerlaptop kernel: NDIS: buggy driver

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:35:35PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: J> there are some more nodes in the tree that are not in the J> netgraph directory. Roman already pointed me to them. This mail with small diffs is dealing with them. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE _

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

there are some more nodes in the tree that are not in the netgraph directory. On Fri, 28 May 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:31:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > J> > JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that > J> > JE>> case could

How do I configure ProFTPd to support resuming broken downloads.

Hi, I found the post on the link below http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=45017+0+archive/2002/freebsd-net/20020106.freebsd-net I have the same problem running Linux Fedora core 1 with proftpd, I can upload/download overwrite, but cannot resume. I can't find any document to configure it

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:14:45PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: R> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:31:18PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: R> >R> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: R> >R> >R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 R> >sparse R> >R> >ty

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:31:18PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: R> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: R> >R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse R> >R> >type. R> >R> > R> >R> Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:31:18PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: R> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: R> >R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse R> >R> >type. R> >R> > R> >R> Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot about device nodes :-

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse R> >type. R> > R> Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot about device nodes :-) Which ones? Just point me and I'll send diffs. My fingers c

NDIS: How can I help with these (2nd request).

I have a LinkSys WPC54GS PCCARD Wireless card, and am using the NDISulator to use the windows driver. I get the following when transferring large files: lerlaptop# tail /var/log/messages May 28 08:37:47 lerlaptop kernel: NDIS: buggy driver deleting active packet pool! May 28 08:37:47 lerlaptop ker

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse R> >type. R> > R> Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot about device nodes :-) Which ones? Just point me and I'll send diffs. My fingers can already convert ng

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

Hi, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: [...] Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse type. Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot about device nodes :-) rik ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:31:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: J> It'd be best to make the change to sparse initialisers a separate patch J> that I cold commit separatly, J> so reduce teh size of the functionality change patch. ... and describe this behavior in manpage. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:31:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: J> It'd be best to make the change to sparse initialisers a separate patch J> that I cold commit separatly, J> so reduce teh size of the functionality change patch. And here is next patch, that must be applied after c99-patch. It int

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

As always I've forgot to attach file to previous mail. Here it is. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE ? ng_ipfw.c ? ng_ipfw.h Index: ng_UI.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netgraph/ng_UI.c,v retrieving revision 1.17 dif

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:31:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: J> > JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that J> > JE>> case could you please convert the initialisation of the typestructs J> > JE>> to use C99 sparse initialisation? In that case future changes

Re: VLAN_MTU (was Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/fxp if_fxp.c if_fxpvar.h)

On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:02:28AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > > Y> Another way I see is to drop automatic fiddling with VLAN_MTU in > > > Y> the first place and implement an option for ifconfig(8) so that a > > > Y> user/admin can control the capability WRT a particular case, e.g., > > > Y> d

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > > JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that > JE>> case could you please convert the initialisation of the typestructs > JE>> to use C99 sparse initialisation? In that c

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that JE>> case could you please convert the initialisation of the typestructs JE>> to use C99 sparse initialisation? In that case future changes will be a good JE>> deal easier. JE

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:15:06AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: J> > JE>> So, what about adding one more netgraph method into struct ng_type, say J> > JE>> ng_preshutdown_t? This method is called first in ng_rmnode(), and then J> > JE>> current shutdown sequence is followed. We will set it to N

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Harti Brandt wrote: > > [Sorry, I just deleted the original mail, so I use Julian's to answer] > > On Thu, 27 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > > JE>On Fri, 28 May 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > JE> > JE>> So, what about adding one more netgraph method into struct ng_typ

Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

[Sorry, I just deleted the original mail, so I use Julian's to answer] On Thu, 27 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: JE>On Fri, 28 May 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: JE> JE>> So, what about adding one more netgraph method into struct ng_type, say JE>> ng_preshutdown_t? This method is called first in