On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:31:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: J> > JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that J> > JE>> case could you please convert the initialisation of the typestructs J> > JE>> to use C99 sparse initialisation? In that case future changes will be a good J> > JE>> deal easier. J> > JE> J> > JE>actually I don't know if you do need to edit the nodes J> > JE>types.. At one time it was true that unassigned elements on J> > JE>the end will be NULL. J> > J> > Sure they will, but this will confuse the next one who is adding J> > a new operation. I was just thinking: 'In the case that Gleb has nothing J> > else to do he could as well just take the chance...' :-) J> J> He seems to have taken the bait J> (heh heh) J> J> It'd be best to make the change to sparse initialisers a separate patch J> that I cold commit separatly, J> so reduce teh size of the functionality change patch. J> J> (or harti could commit it.., or ruslan)
Agreed. I make a series of patches then :) Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse type. AFAIK, we also have two netgraph ports. Adding of preshutdown method will break them. I'll fix ng_netflow port, and notify maintainer of ng_daphne. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
