> At Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT),
> Chance Whaley wrote:
> > I have an application where I am doing quite a bit of high-touch packet
> > fiddling and I am looking for opinions on which "standard" Gb NIC
> > has the best driver support in 5.2 or CURRENT.
> >
> > In my dream world I am loo
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:56:37PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> It would be nice if patches where in the ports tree until they included
> in the vendor distribution. That is what ports are for, aren't they?
I haven't gotten round to this, my bad, and we're currently in freeze.
Regards
BMS
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, David Yeske wrote:
>
> > I made another attempt with netgraph and I think I'm almost there, but I'm
> > still having some issues. I found a linux solution called veth
> > http://www.geocities.com/nestorjpg/veth/ which mig
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, David Yeske wrote:
> I made another attempt with netgraph and I think I'm almost there, but I'm
> still having some issues. I found a linux solution called veth
> http://www.geocities.com/nestorjpg/veth/ which might do the job, but I would
> prefer to use netgraph if possib
David Yeske wrote on April 26, 2004 1:23 PM
> I made another attempt with netgraph and I think I'm almost there, but I'm
> still having some issues. I found a linux solution called veth
> http://www.geocities.com/nestorjpg/veth/ which might do the job,
> but I would
> prefer to use netgraph if pos
I made another attempt with netgraph and I think I'm almost there, but I'm
still having some issues. I found a linux solution called veth
http://www.geocities.com/nestorjpg/veth/ which might do the job, but I would
prefer to use netgraph if possible. Here is some more detailed config
information.
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net NFS root configurations without dynamic
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:45:21AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >Are there corresponding patches for routing daemons available to public?
>
> The links were posted a few times. The keywords "bgp md5 quagga freebsd
> patches" in google first link points to
> http://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quag
At 01:37 AM 26/04/2004, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Are there corresponding patches for routing daemons available to public?
The links were posted a few times. The keywords "bgp md5 quagga freebsd
patches" in google first link points to
http://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-users/2004-February/001
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 04:11:12PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
I tried to replace a cable, to reset the switch, to reboot this 4.9-STABLE
box - nothing helps. What should I try next?
Did you tried another port on a switch?
Yes, I tried several. No change. All
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 04:11:12PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> >I tried to replace a cable, to reset the switch, to reboot this 4.9-STABLE
> >box - nothing helps. What should I try next?
> Did you tried another port on a switch?
Yes, I tried several. No change. All other ports of switch
carry
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hi!
My Intel motherboard contains on-boad NIC:
em0: port
0xac00-0xac1f mem 0xfe9e-0xfe9f irq 10 at device 1.0 on pci2
It it connected to Allied Telesyn AT FS724i unmanaged switch,
media is autodetected correctly - 100baseTX full-duplex.
It worked nice for 3 months
Hi!
My Intel motherboard contains on-boad NIC:
em0: port
0xac00-0xac1f mem 0xfe9e-0xfe9f irq 10 at device 1.0 on pci2
It it connected to Allied Telesyn AT FS724i unmanaged switch,
media is autodetected correctly - 100baseTX full-duplex.
It worked nice for 3 months. Today morning switch
13 matches
Mail list logo
