--On onsdag, mars 17, 2004 00.21.44 +0100 "Arno J. Klaassen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have an ASUS motherboard A7V8X-E Deluxe with onboard 10/100/1000
Mbit/s NIC from Marvell Semiconductor.
My problem is that it sometimes lock up with the error message
sk0: watchdog timeout
I have a
Hello all.
I currently have 2 different gateways..
one deafult x.x.x.161 (ip on my NIC is x.x.x.162(fxp1))
and x.x.x.141 (ip on my NIC is x.x.x.142 (using vlan0))
I'm currently running NAT using IPNAT, by
map fxp1 from 192.168.1.8 ! to 192.168.0.0/16 -> x.x.x.162/32 portmap tcp auto
all works fine
> They are not timing out after 2MSL. I set my MSL to the lowest possible
> setting (10) as to make TIME_WAIT connections disappear. The FIN_WAIT_[1,2]
> and LAST_ACK seem to be sticking around for a while.
> >Do the FIN_WAIT_1|2 and LAST_ACK time out after 2MSL or do they stick
> >around foreve
> While I have everybody's attention, what's a reasonable goal for
> throughput between two of these cards? I broke through the 33mhz pci
> barrier and am now getting iperf results of:
Not sure about BCM chips, but good GE cards can do wire speed:
Intel PRO/1000 - controller 82547EI integrated o
Hello:
I'm running a BIND 9 in a FreeBSD 4.5 and named daemon goes down
until a pediod of time (it's running but doesn't respond to any request).
I can see in the /var/log/messages:
Apr 5 16:12:15 Naomi /kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response from 365 to
200 packets per second
I used tcpdump i
Hi,
I have a Broadcom BCM5788 card that I'd like to use with jumboframes, but
it seems that the card (or the driver) only allows a max of 1500 MTU.
ifconfig bge0 mtu 9000
ifconfig: ioctl (set mtu): Invalid argument
1500 and less works.
I had this problem with my BCM5707M, and lo and behold if y
I started using SNMP to monitor some floppy based routers we have
and I have noticed that outgoing broadcast packets do not show up
in the counters. Multicast packets where fine. I dug into some
and SNMP daemon is reported what the OS is telling it. Does
anybody have an idea what is wrong or where
Hi,
I told you all I'd be back for more :) I am not sure if this is the most
appropriate place to post this, but it seems that you all know what the
hell you're talking about, so I figure you can help me out here.
As I said in my previous post about the FIN_WAIT states, I am writing a web
su
Brandon Erhart wrote:
They are not timing out after 2MSL. I set my MSL to the lowest possible
setting (10) as to make TIME_WAIT connections disappear. The
FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK seem to be sticking around for a while.
However, not ALL of them stick around for a "long time"(more on this in
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 10:15:29 +0200,
> "Sebastien Petit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Unfortunatly, I can't use bpf/pcap solution because I must do some
> setsockopts (like IP_MULTICAST_IF, IP_MULTICAST_TTL, IP_MULTICAST_ADD_MEMBER
> etc.) and this can't be done on bpf/pcap.
> When I'm usi
You are right. I was looking to quickly. However at least my Cisco
doesn't like it: "Bad mask 0xFD00 for address", IOS 12.2(10).
As I mentioned in my first email, Cisco only supports contignous netmasks.
I was just trying to elaborate on when/why non-contignous netmasks
would be good to have
Hello Freebsdnet-list,
Is there anyone who knows how to run PIM-SM over Freebsd?
I only found mrouted, but I would to try PIM-SM since it claims to implement this.
Many thanks in advance,
fuhua
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
Anders Lowinger wrote:
>
> Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> >> interface ethernet 0
> >>ip address 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.253.0
> >
> > This is simply a supernet (aka classless) but *not* a non-contignous
> > netmask. A non-contignous netmask would look like 255.254.255.0.
>
> Nope, 255.255.2
Hello,
>can any of the driver writers or porters help with porting the atw driver
> from netbsd to freebsd. this is for the admtek 802.11b network based cards.
>
Would like to help in the port. I have and SMC AP, a PCMCIA
card and PCI card. Let me know how/when to get started.
Andre Oppermann wrote:
interface ethernet 0
ip address 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.253.0
This is simply a supernet (aka classless) but *not* a non-contignous
netmask. A non-contignous netmask would look like 255.254.255.0.
Nope, 255.255.253.0 binary is ..1101.
which
Anders Lowinger wrote:
>
> > So far I haven't found any useful application of non-contignous
> > mask in network applications.
>
> The only reason I've ever heard is when joining two separate subnets,
> for example (sorry my cisco style, i'm a routing guy)
>
>interface ethernet 0
> ip ad
So far I haven't found any useful application of non-contignous
mask in network applications.
The only reason I've ever heard is when joining two separate subnets,
for example (sorry my cisco style, i'm a routing guy)
interface ethernet 0
ip address 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0
interface e
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have noticed an increasing number of machines on the net
>are terminating their session (usually the server, but not always)
>with a RESET packet instead of a FIN packet.
>
>I don't know what kind of machines this is but next time I see it I
>guess
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Richard Wendland wrote:
> > Per-protocol limits _could_ have some advantages; the 16 frags per packet
> > limit was chosen to account for NFS over UDP. For TCP, we could drop that
> > to 3 frags per packet,
>
> The 16 frags per packet limit seems low to me for TCP already, bl
Unfortunatly, I can't use bpf/pcap solution because I must do some
setsockopts (like IP_MULTICAST_IF, IP_MULTICAST_TTL, IP_MULTICAST_ADD_MEMBER
etc.) and this can't be done on bpf/pcap.
When I'm using IPPROTO_VRRP (ip proto 112), All work fine (and other ip
proto type I think). What is the reason t
20 matches
Mail list logo
