You are right. I was looking to quickly. However at least my Cisco doesn't like it: "Bad mask 0xFFFFFD00 for address", IOS 12.2(10).
As I mentioned in my first email, Cisco only supports contignous netmasks.
I was just trying to elaborate on when/why non-contignous netmasks would be good to have. I'm pretty sure no-one is using them....
Never heard of that (only supernets/subnets with respect to classful notation), never done it and at least my Cisco 7500 doesn't like it. So I doubt others have got their Cisco to like it.
Correct. This is one of the first thing they mention in the manuals.
/Anders
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
