Jacob S. Barrett:
>I have some questions about the ng_fec. Would it work if each interface
>was connected to a different switch?
I'd say this isn't an issue with ng_fec, but rather an architectural
point regarding EtherChannel as such.
I am not aware of any switch vendor that offers multi-chassis
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:48:20AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:29:39PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> R> > I have one more idea. Currently we have got 3 interface nodes: ng_ether,
> ng_iface,
> R> > ng_eiface. 2 of them already support "getifindex" message, imagine I
Hi,
This is this the correct list on how to set up a VPN connection?
Thanks
Zen
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I have some questions about the ng_fec. Would it work if each interface was
connected to a different switch? Everything I have read on the list says
that they done it only with having "trunking" enabled on the switch as well.
I don't see how you could do that across two switches. If no one h
On Monday 08 March 2004 01:41 pm, Will Saxon wrote:
> Regardless, it doesn't look like ng_fec can work with ng_vlan, since
> it doesn't provide any hooks to work with.
Couldn't you attach ng_vlan downstream to the ng_ether lower that will created
for the ng_fec interface?
--
Jacob S. Barrett
[E
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Mark Allman wrote:
> > > I hope it is clear to everyone that an investment in the 50K$
> > > range would provide a professional-grade implementation of SACK
> > > for FreeBSD, and this money is in the noise for any organization
> > > that uses trans-oceanic gigabit link
< said:
> I believe that sme of the patches were considerred "experimental and
> just lacked someone to make them production quality. In other cases they
> were not against 'current' and porting them to -curren twas left as "an
> exercise for the reader". No-one who had that ime had a need for th
On Sunday 07 March 2004 15:37, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Note that forcing it to 100baseT half-duplex (or 10baseT/UTP half-duplex)
> corrects the problem ... turns out it is only in full-duplex mode that
> its hosed ...
Did you try a cross-over cable? Actually, you shouldn't even need a
cross-
> > I hope it is clear to everyone that an investment in the 50K$
> > range would provide a professional-grade implementation of SACK
> > for FreeBSD, and this money is in the noise for any organization
> > that uses trans-oceanic gigabit links.
>
> What Luigi says is absolutely correct.
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:32:37PM -0800, Jeffrey Hsu wrote:
> >> I know that our organization would love to see SACK. Much of the
> >> high-performance network development that used to be on FreeBSD has
> >> moved to Linux simply because SACK is essential. You can't run
> >> trans-oceanic
Hello,
as you may have seen pf is now linked to the build and can be installed from
the base system. Make sure to run `mergemaster -p' before the installworld
as it requires two additional user accounts/groups.
If you do not want to build/install pf you can use the NO_PF knob in
/etc/make.conf
F
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Will Saxon wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: eberkut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 3:57 PM
> > To: Jacob S. Barrett
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Solution for Resilient VLAN Trunk Bonding
> >
> >
> > > I would ha
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:22:55 -0800
> > From: Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:22:10PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:24:31AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately,
one feedback I can provide to this patch...
under [any] interface checks (the loose check mode), if the route
is pointed toward a discard interface (e.g. ds0 in freebsd, Null0 in cisco),
drop the packet.
under cisco, route pointed to null0 creates a null ad
>> I know that our organization would love to see SACK. Much of the
>> high-performance network development that used to be on FreeBSD has
>> moved to Linux simply because SACK is essential. You can't run
>> trans-oceanic TCP streams of gigabit or more throughput without it.
>
> Wheneve
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:40:20PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I'm not trying to stat a flame war here, but it is frustrating and this
> initiative for a major network code overhaul makes me hope that
> something will actually happen. It's just that FreeBSD's network stack
> was once the best aro
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:29:39PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
R> > I have one more idea. Currently we have got 3 interface nodes: ng_ether,
ng_iface,
R> > ng_eiface. 2 of them already support "getifindex" message, imagine I (or someone
else) send
R> > you patch tomorrow, which adds support to
> -Original Message-
> From: eberkut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 3:57 PM
> To: Jacob S. Barrett
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Solution for Resilient VLAN Trunk Bonding
>
>
> > I would have liked to have used either ng_fec or
> ng_one2many, but neit
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:22:55 -0800
> From: Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:22:10PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:24:31AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, SACK is often looked upon as a waste of effort to those
>
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:22:55PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:22:10PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:24:31AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, SACK is often looked upon as a waste of effort to those
> > > who use nets in m
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:20:33PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:02:28PM -0800, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> R> Synopsis: [patch] new control message for ng_iface(4) - getifindex
> R>
> R> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> R> State-Changed-By: ru
> R> State-Changed-When:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:56:21PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
[...]
> > We still have a similar problem in in_gif_output(), and I wonder what
> > would be a correct fix, given the above?
>
> in_gif_output() is not the same as the route cache of ip_forward. It
> just caches the route to the tun
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:22:10PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:24:31AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, SACK is often looked upon as a waste of effort to those
> > who use nets in more commercial forms where aggregation of lots of small
> > streams is
Has anybody tried mpd with a NATM interface yet?
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> I would have liked to have used either ng_fec or ng_one2many, but neither
> of them detects link failures.
According to the original ng_fec announcement [1] on freebsd-net, ng_fec
should be able to detect link failure by checking the interfaces in the
bundle once every second.
Even though I don
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> this seems pretty spartan.. For example no description as to what
> is going on in mpd..
Currently we are working on Mpd-4, wich is Mpd-3 + libpdel, currently
there are no functional changes, we "just" replaced some subsystems of Mpd
with the ones
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Luuk van Dijk wrote:
> >
> > Anyone feeling like lending a hand is more than welcome :-) Eg.: one
> > rather isolated thing on the todo list is to bring ipv6 support in mpd.
> >
> great, just a short remark, if you
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:24:31AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 23:50:11 +0100
> > From: Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > David Malone wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:18:34PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > > > []
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:19:35AM -0800, Jerry Jensen wrote:
> How can this be done programmatically rather than from
> the command line? Code snippets would be handy.
This should contain the snippets you need for instantiating cloneable
interfaces, including ds(4) and lo(4).
BMS
/* $Free
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Luuk van Dijk wrote:
>
> Anyone feeling like lending a hand is more than welcome :-) Eg.: one
> rather isolated thing on the todo list is to bring ipv6 support in mpd.
>
great, just a short remark, if you are going to provide patches for Mpd,
then please make them against
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:13:57PM -0800, Jerry Jensen wrote:
> is it possible in freebsd to have multiple logical
> interfaces associated with say the loopback interface?
> if so, how does one do this programmatically (as
> opposed to from the command line).
You can have multiple instances of lo
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:18:59PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > There has been the "enternal" debate, clean up the stack and/or add features
> > or the resistance to commit the clean up and/or new features.
>
> I think these days are over and I have committed a couple of larger
> changes in t
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net NFS root configurations without dynamic
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:24:31AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
...
> I know that our organization would love to see SACK. Much of the
> high-performance network development that used to be on FreeBSD has
> moved to Linux simply because SACK is essential. You can't run
> trans-oceanic TCP streams of
Hello, mpd-users.
I've decided to migrate from 4.9-STABLE to 5.2.1-RELEASE, and found,
that mpd-3.16 on 5.2.1-RELEASE works strange: everything is ok, for
example, with generic vpn, but PPPoE server mode crashes system,
when loading netgraph modules as kld. When i've recompiled kernel
wi
> Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 23:50:11 +0100
> From: Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> David Malone wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:18:34PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > > [] automatically sizing TCP send buffers to achieve optimal performance
> > >
Mark Tinguely wrote:
>
> > I think these days are over and I have committed a couple of larger
> > changes in the IP code a couple month ago with more to come.
>
> Great, I haven't been in the -current network code for a few months.
>
> Dave Zarzycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted a SACK / FACK pa
> I think these days are over and I have committed a couple of larger
> changes in the IP code a couple month ago with more to come.
Great, I haven't been in the -current network code for a few months.
Dave Zarzycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted a SACK / FACK patch for
the 22 Aug 2001 version of c
Mark Tinguely wrote:
>
>
> > > This reminded me - do you know what happened to the plan to implement
> > > SACK for FreeBSD? I'm working with a research group that's interested
> >
> > what plan, there never was one :)
> >
> > cheers
> > luigi (who wrote some FreeBSD SACK code back in 1996!)
> > This reminded me - do you know what happened to the plan to implement
> > SACK for FreeBSD? I'm working with a research group that's interested
>
> what plan, there never was one :)
>
> cheers
> luigi (who wrote some FreeBSD SACK code back in 1996!)
There has been the "enternal" debate,
> How can this be done programmatically rather than from
> the command line? Code snippets would be handy.
What "this" is?
ifconfig?
execlp("ifconfig", "ifconfig", "lo0", "inet", inetxt);
I never ifconfigured from C.
Sorry.
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Actually, what I want is the equi
Problem was the firewall in the isp router, is allows icmp everywhere and
incomming traffic to 10/8 but only outbound traffic from 10/24 - changed that to
10/16 and viola!
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
I've previously used my freebsd box as a bridge between ath0, fxp1 and fxp0 -
but since the bridge doesnt allow me to divert packets I'm wanting to set up
routing instead.
Network sketch:
,- ath0 --- wireless lan
netopia 3351 / 10.0.2.1/24
isp router
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> Andre,
>
> I see you've fixed ip_forward() so that it no longer caches (possibly
> stale) route, which is great. What are the performance impacts of this
> change, have you measured it?
I've removed the "route cache" in ip_forward() mainly because it was
a major headac
Andre,
I see you've fixed ip_forward() so that it no longer caches (possibly
stale) route, which is great. What are the performance impacts of this
change, have you measured it?
We still have a similar problem in in_gif_output(), and I wonder what
would be a correct fix, given the above?
Cheer
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:02:28PM -0800, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
R> Synopsis: [patch] new control message for ng_iface(4) - getifindex
R>
R> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
R> State-Changed-By: ru
R> State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 7 15:01:03 PST 2004
R> State-Changed-Why:
R> Committed with tiny m
How can this be done programmatically rather than from
the command line? Code snippets would be handy.
Thanks
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Actually, what I want is the equivalent of this
> (which
> > is in Linux) on FreeBSD. Note the ip address
> > associated with each of the logical inter
47 matches
Mail list logo
