Mark Tinguely wrote: > > > > > This reminded me - do you know what happened to the plan to implement > > > SACK for FreeBSD? I'm working with a research group that's interested > > > > what plan, there never was one :) > > > > cheers > > luigi (who wrote some FreeBSD SACK code back in 1996!) > > There has been the "enternal" debate, clean up the stack and/or add features > or the resistance to commit the clean up and/or new features.
I think these days are over and I have committed a couple of larger changes in the IP code a couple month ago with more to come. So if you have new stuff, bring it on and we will judge it on its merits and code quality. > IMO, in the world that is growing ever more wireless, SACK, ECN, and RFC3042 > *should be* automatically in the TCP stack or we are at a competitive > disadvantage. These could be added pretty easily. RFC3042 is already in (done by Jeffrey Hsu) and defaults to enable in -CURRENT along with Inflight and RFC3390. -- Andre _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
