Re: Arp and Route Commands

2002-11-17 Thread Dmitry A. Bondareff
Hi! If you need route throw router with MAC 00:00:ca:13:4b:54 do like this: route add -net 10.10.10.0 -interface eth1 route add default 10.10.10.1 If the network 10.10.10.0 routing by your FreeBSD box: you must add route on the central router to network 10.10.10.0 throw your FreeBSD. For Cisco

RE: Qs about snoop TCP

2002-11-17 Thread chunan.li
Hi Maybe the attached is what you want. Br. ChunAn Li -Original Message- From: ext soheil soheil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 10:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Qs about snoop TCP Dear All I want to know what is Snoop TCP , and Is it implemented o

Re: Qs about snoop TCP

2002-11-17 Thread Terry Lambert
soheil soheil wrote: > Dear All > > I want to know what is Snoop TCP , and Is it implemented on FreeBSD or Not ? Snoop TCP is a mechansim for performing impedence matching between a network with very little loss attached at the border of a network with much more loss. It operates as a pseudo-app

Re: Arp and Route Commands

2002-11-17 Thread .
> Hi, > > I tried that, but I'm just a dumb high school kid who even after > reading it, didn't understand the syntax, nor how to make it work. This is like translations between human languages - hard in common case but possible every patucular case. What is yours circumstances? > Sorry > > Kar

Re: Arp and Route Commands

2002-11-17 Thread Karl Timmermann
Hi, I tried that, but I'm just a dumb high school kid who even after reading it, didn't understand the syntax, nor how to make it work. Sorry Karl On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 04:58 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote: Karl, try man arp man route on your FreeBSD system. Martin Karl Timmerman

Re: Arp and Route Commands [sorry]

2002-11-17 Thread Karl Timmermann
Sorry, I should have tried this out before sending the other email. Your new route comand works, but the arp command says: set: can only proxy for 10.10.10.0 Any ideas? Thanks again, Karl set: can only proxy for 10.10.10.0 On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 04:59 PM, Martin J. Muench wrote: I

Re: Arp and Route Commands

2002-11-17 Thread Martin Stiemerling
Karl, try man arp man route on your FreeBSD system. Martin Karl Timmermann wrote: Hello, I'm new to the list and was hoping maybe someone could help me. These commands work in Linux (and in this order), but not in FreeBSD/Mac OS X as the arp and route commands are different: arp -s 10.10.1

Arp and Route Commands

2002-11-17 Thread Karl Timmermann
Hello, I'm new to the list and was hoping maybe someone could help me. These commands work in Linux (and in this order), but not in FreeBSD/Mac OS X as the arp and route commands are different: arp -s 10.10.10.0 00:00:ca:13:4b:54 -i eth1 arp -s 10.10.10.0 00:00:ca:13:4b:54 -i eth1 route add -ne

broken IFF_ALLMULTI handling in many drivers

2002-11-17 Thread Luigi Rizzo
[Bcc to re@ because it would be good to have it fixed before 5.0] Hi, Pavlin Radoslavov recently discovered a problem that affects several network drivers and tends to show up when running multicast routing. The problem is that the multicast routing code calls iff_allmulti() on the interfaces, wh

Re: ping6 ::1 -> No route to host

2002-11-17 Thread drogoh
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:40:22 +0100 Ronald van der Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:17:02 -0600, drogoh wrote: > > > I have rules to allow protocol 41 in and out, what else should I have? > > I had a similar problem when I upgraded to -current. All IPv6 packets > were b

Netgraph support with the Sangoma's boards

2002-11-17 Thread Vincent Jardin
According to Google, there is not support of Netgraph with the Sangoma's boards. In fact, I am wondering if I could use the Sangoma's boards like the if_sr and if_ar drivers that have a nice Netgraph hook. Vincent To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" i

Qs about snoop TCP

2002-11-17 Thread soheil soheil
Dear All I want to know what is Snoop TCP , and Is it implemented on FreeBSD or Not ? After I want to know if There is any Performance Enhancing Proxy on the NET _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join

Re: ping6 ::1 -> No route to host

2002-11-17 Thread Ronald van der Pol
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:17:02 -0600, drogoh wrote: > I have rules to allow protocol 41 in and out, what else should I have? I had a similar problem when I upgraded to -current. All IPv6 packets were blocked bij default. Are you sure you are not blocking native IPv6 packets to localhost. You co

Re: if_ef doesn't work with if_fxp?

2002-11-17 Thread Dan Lukes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 11/14/02 15:26: I checked with our network/netware guy, and he's told me that we're running "0 interface with an Ethernet_II frame", so I've got fxp0f0 configured with our network number, which he's given me as 0x83a2c800 Yust for fun - 0x83a2c800=131.162.200.0,

Re: ping6 ::1 -> No route to host

2002-11-17 Thread drogoh
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:37:50 +0100 Ronald van der Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Check firewalling. I think IPv6 ipfilter is blocking by default. > > rvdp > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > I have rules to