Re: New natd available

2002-10-01 Thread Webbie
This is great news, thank you guys. This is what I found during my testing. #1. Connecting from w2k behind the fbsd using VPN doesn't work. Using the original natd does not have this problem, #2. rdr, can we redirect udp as well? This is my conf file, divert port natd -> dp1 nat on dp1 from an

Re: Dummynet Usage Problems

2002-10-01 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Vinod wrote: > i use the commands > ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to 10.0.1.0/24 > ipfw pipe 1 config bw 100Kbit/s Make sure that you don't have ipfw allow all from any to any before the rule which adds pipe 1. If so, packets will never enter the pipe. Mike "Silby" Silbersack

Re: Dummynet Usage Problems

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Eggert
Vinod wrote: > --- Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>That looks OK. What does "ipfw show" print? > ipfw pipe 1 show prints: 1: 100.000 Kbit/s 0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x ->0x/0x *Just* "ipfw show" - I was wondering if your pack

Re: Dummynet Usage Problems

2002-10-01 Thread Vinod
ipfw pipe 1 show prints: 1: 100.000 Kbit/s 0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x ->0x/0x Thanks, Vinod --- Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vinod wrote: > > my topology loks like this: > > > > 10.0.0.8 > >

Re: Dummynet Usage Problems

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Eggert
Vinod wrote: > my topology loks like this: > > 10.0.0.8 > _ _ _ Video Server > | > outsideswitch-proxy---clients >10.0.0.2 10.0.1.1 10.0.1.0/24 > > i dont have any other firewall rules.I am

Re: limit to data in flight

2002-10-01 Thread Eli Dart
Sorry to reply to my own post, but I have some updated info... It appears that a host route is being cloned from the default route. The host route has an ssthresh value associated with it, which is picked up by subsequent connections that use this route. We attempted to lock the ssthresh valu

Re: Dummynet Usage Problems

2002-10-01 Thread Vinod
my topology loks like this: 10.0.0.8 _ _ _ Video Server | outsideswitch-proxy---clients 10.0.0.2 10.0.1.1 10.0.1.0/24 i dont have any other firewall rules.I am using Dummynet just as a packet

Re: Dummynet Usage Problems

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Eggert
Vinod wrote: > i have proxy from which i would like to throttle the > bandwidth of clients.the proxy acts as a router here. > > i use the commands > ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to 10.0.1.0/24 > ipfw pipe 1 config bw 100Kbit/s > > but i still dont see any reduction in bw.its the same > high bw it

Dummynet Usage Problems

2002-10-01 Thread Vinod
i am sorry to ask such a simple question but however hard i have tried i am not getting 'dummynet' to work. i have proxy from which i would like to throttle the bandwidth of clients.the proxy acts as a router here. i use the commands ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to 10.0.1.0/24 ipfw pipe 1 config

limit to data in flight

2002-10-01 Thread Eli Dart
Hi all, I'm seeing something strange here... I have a freebsd box running iperf (4.6-RELEASE-p1, iperf 1.6.2 with pthreads patches). When attempting to use a 1MB tcp window, the box won't put more than 256kB in flight after the first connection to a given host. I seem to remember hearing/re

IPsec & Multiple WAN links

2002-10-01 Thread Cambria, Mike
Hi, I've been running FreeBSD on 2 boxes, each with their own WAN links for over 18 months or so. Each box has its own WAN link (one uses T1 leased line to a remote site, the other uses DSL to an ISP.) The ISP link runs IPsec and racoon The other end of the IPsec tunnel is a VPN appliance.

Re: Intel PRO/100 S

2002-10-01 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Marc Ernst Eddy van Woerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-01 ] [ Subjecte: Intel PRO/100 S ] > Hi, > > yesterday I bought a network card to connect a second PC > to my old machine. > They had only one type of card in the store so I bought it anyway, > despite its rather hig

Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2002-10-01 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:42:08AM -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > Hello Julian, > > Sorry to bug you, but are you still interested in this? Not sure if you > were following but the latest snapshot (2002/09/22) is available for download > at http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ > > I asking bec

Re: New natd available

2002-10-01 Thread Lars Eggert
Andre Oppermann wrote: > > In the FreeBSD May-June 2002 Status Report we have announced a natd > rewrite to make it's configuration options more powerful and support > more ip addresses to nat to. I haven't had time to look at the new natd yet, but the old one would easily get into a state wher

Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2002-10-01 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hello Julian, Sorry to bug you, but are you still interested in this? Not sure if you were following but the latest snapshot (2002/09/22) is available for download at http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ I asking because you are the only person who has some interest and actually looked at the co

Intel PRO/100 S

2002-10-01 Thread Marc Ernst Eddy van Woerkom
Hi, yesterday I bought a network card to connect a second PC to my old machine. They had only one type of card in the store so I bought it anyway, despite its rather high price of 37 Euro. Today I took a closer look. It is an Intel PRO/100 S board packaged in plastic pack, without docs. It co

unix routing

2002-10-01 Thread John Angelmo
Hello I'm looking for a good book on unix routing (from the ground up) every routingbook I seem to find only cover IOS. There are diffrent solutions, for example gated, zebra and so on, what is most used and what can you recomend and what supports both ipv6 and ipv4 thanks /John To Unsubscr

Re: non-transparent IPsec via a tun interface?

2002-10-01 Thread Julian Elischer
I have done similar to this using teh GIF interface. Each tunnel between sites had a gif interface and I firewalled for only ESP packets to and from the correct machines on the external interface, and for correct packets for permitted protocols and ports on the unencrypted data on the gif interfa

non-transparent IPsec via a tun interface?

2002-10-01 Thread Guido van Rooij
I have a firewall system that has a dedicated interface on which nly IPsec traffic is going out and comming in. The firewall encrypts and decrypts these packets. I am using Ipfilter on that system and I would like to filter on the unencrypted content, both incoming and outgoing. The problem is

Re: New natd available

2002-10-01 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:34:35AM +0300, Ari Suutari wrote: > Hi, > > Great to see natd maintained. As original author, I kind of miss > the long command line options (ie. something like > --daemon in addition to -d). > I used getopt(3) to parse the commandline because I hate to reinvent the w