On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020707 21:48] wrote:
> >
> > I do have a smaller TIME_WAIT structure done; it even throws the socket
> > away since it isn't needed. The savings are currently about 500 bytes,
> > and I can and also perform some
* Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020707 21:48] wrote:
>
> I do have a smaller TIME_WAIT structure done; it even throws the socket
> away since it isn't needed. The savings are currently about 500 bytes,
> and I can and also perform some other savings in the general case.
>
> I think Alfred
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you write:
>
>On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
>> Possibly, but the additional pointer dereference would be expensive
>> and a lot of code would have to change without the compatibility
>> macros.
>>
>> I sort of did it as a proof of concept, but of cour
- Original Message -
From: "Kim Okasawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 4:01 PM
Subject: Methods to detect Internet censorship.
> Dear all,
>
> First, I need to apologize because this question is not FreeBSD-specific,
> but I
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Possibly, but the additional pointer dereference would be expensive
> and a lot of code would have to change without the compatibility
> macros.
>
> I sort of did it as a proof of concept, but of course since it doesn't
> completely work I haven't pr
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 01:14:21PM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-07-07 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: the incredible shrinking socket ]
> >
> > On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > > Some time ago I noticed that there appeared to be
This is not on topic for any freebsd-* lists, except -chat.
--
"We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power.
And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory."
- George W. Bush, President of the United States
State of the Union, January
Hi Eric,
I'm neither for nor against Internet censorship. I am just working on a
research project that needs information on which US sites are being blocked
by certain countries. I don't want to get into the discussions of whether
censorship is good or bad. All I want is to find out, techni
>"Kim Okasawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are there other inexpensive ways to detect the censorships? I'm open
> > to any possible methods.
>
>Set up an open Squid proxy. Wait five minutes. Check the proxy logs
>and figure out what sites people access through your proxy, and from
>where.
>
"Kim Okasawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there other inexpensive ways to detect the censorships? I'm open
> to any possible methods.
Set up an open Squid proxy. Wait five minutes. Check the proxy logs
and figure out what sites people access through your proxy, and from
where.
OK, so it
* Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020707 12:36] wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > Some time ago I noticed that there appeared to be several members
> > of struct socket that were either only used by listen sockets or
> > only used by data sockets.
> >
> > I've tak
* De: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-07-07 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: the incredible shrinking socket ]
>
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > Some time ago I noticed that there appeared to be several members
> > of struct socket that were either only used by list
Dear all,
First, I need to apologize because this question is not FreeBSD-specific,
but I believe I may be able to find some good answers or insights from here.
Currently I'm working on a research project about Internet censorship in
certain Asia and middle east countries. I need to find out
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Some time ago I noticed that there appeared to be several members
> of struct socket that were either only used by listen sockets or
> only used by data sockets.
>
> I've taken a stab at unionizing the members and we wind up saving
> 28 bytes per soc
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 03:17:28PM -0700, Patrick Thomas wrote:
>
> I have just purchased a Linksys USB100M - it is a very small key-style USB
> NIC. I am running 5.0-DP1. I have all of the USB items except for the
> removable disk device compiled into my kernel - I also have the three
> aue/cu
Some time ago I noticed that there appeared to be several members
of struct socket that were either only used by listen sockets or
only used by data sockets.
I've taken a stab at unionizing the members and we wind up saving
28 bytes per socket on i386, and probably nearly double that on
any 64 bi
16 matches
Mail list logo
