On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > 09:05:36.961787 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111
> > 261 win 4380 (DF)
> > > 09:05:38.973207 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 25971
bridging is incompatible with cards which hear their own
transmissions (~IFF_SIMPLEX). I am not sure if the "ep" is one of this kind.
if you do an 'ifconfig' and you do not see the 'SIMPLEX' flag
set for the card, then you can suspect that.
I should probably put code in the bridging code to make
I'm having a problem where the bridging code seems to be doing weird
things. To eliminate the possibility of a real loop, the second
ethernet interface is connected to a hub with no machines on it.
However, I am still seeing messages like:
Jun 30 16:24:48 zprime /kernel: -- loop (0) 00.60.97.88
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Angelmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: increasing throughput
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, John Angelmo wrote:
> > I was thinking of cunstructing a small router
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 01:01:35PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
...
> The reason I said "seemingly" is because of the fact that I don't
> think that it is your "grouping" of both clusters and mbufs that
> specifically causes the perf. increase to the extent you showed with
> your tests. Wh
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:56:40AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> Hi,
> you can read the numbers I posted as you like, but in the non-SMP
> case performance is not "seemingly" better, it IS better.
The reason I said "seemingly" is because of the fact that I don't
think that it is your "group
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 21:14, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Peter J. Blok writes:
> > I have a gateway/firewall which is the spider in the web for different IP
> > segments. From two segments 192.168.2.0/24 and 192.168.10.0/24 I am
> > trying to setup PPTP tunnels. I have two different pptp sections (ppt
Anthony Volodkin writes:
> - Now that perfectly works, (proxy-arp too, is very impressive) I am
> trying to figure out how to forward broadcast packets from ng0 to fxp0
> and vice-versa. Something tells me since this is an interface created
> by netgraph, it should be possible. I tried the et
Scott Hess wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, John Angelmo wrote:
> > I was thinking of cunstructing a small routerbox in my sparetime. Now
> > since FreeBSD is my choise of OS i was thinking of a small box silent
> > box.
> >
> > So how can I combine speed, size, silence and price?
>
> I'm very int
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:12:22AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 01:01:35PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> ...
> > The reason I said "seemingly" is because of the fact that I don't
> > think that it is your "grouping" of both clusters and mbufs that
> > specifically cau
Jorgen Maas writes:
> I've got an annoying problem here with MPD (3.8).
> I use MPD to setup a PPTP session to my adsl modem, but after (approx)
> 24 hours of being online my Internet connection gets slower and slower.
> When I try to do a traceroute or a ping I get some warning: out of buffers
>
Peter J. Blok writes:
> I have a gateway/firewall which is the spider in the web for different IP
> segments. From two segments 192.168.2.0/24 and 192.168.10.0/24 I am trying to
> setup PPTP tunnels. I have two different pptp sections (pptp1 and pptp2) in
> both mpd.conf and mpd.links with uniq
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, John Angelmo wrote:
> I was thinking of cunstructing a small routerbox in my sparetime. Now
> since FreeBSD is my choise of OS i was thinking of a small box silent
> box.
>
> So how can I combine speed, size, silence and price?
I'm very interested in this type of product (mea
Hi,
you can read the numbers I posted as you like, but in the non-SMP
case performance is not "seemingly" better, it IS better.
Before people think differently:
the code i posted is _perfectly safe_ to use under the assumption
that I used -- i.e. that you hold Giant when manipulating t
Hallo,
My FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE machine is
connected to the internet via a cable connection. And when booting (or running
dhclient) I get an IP address. But when I have an IP address and my ISP wants to
give me a new IP address I doesn't go the way it should. Because I don't get the
new IP a
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, John Angelmo wrote:
> I was thinking of cunstructing a small routerbox in my sparetime.
> Now since FreeBSD is my choise of OS i was thinking of a small box
> silent box.
>
> So how can I combine speed, size, silence and price?
>
> I was thinking of vias small buget systems
Their has been some discussion about conf/3517 which is about ipf(8)
filtering for IPv6. I see -current has this in /etc/rc.d/ipfilter:
ipfilter_start()
{
echo "Enabling ipfilter."
case `${CMD_OSTYPE}` in
FreeBSD)
${ipfilter_program:-/sbin/ipf} -Fa -f \
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:04:23AM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> There are several problems with your "simple" code that make it simpler
> than what's in -CURRENT and in -STABLE and therefore yield [obviously]
> seemingly better times.
>
> 1) sleeping in the case of a system exhausted of
Hello
I was thinking of cunstructing a small routerbox in my sparetime.
Now since FreeBSD is my choise of OS i was thinking of a small box
silent box.
So how can I combine speed, size, silence and price?
I was thinking of vias small buget systems (via Eden) and to that an
extra intel pro 10/1
There are several problems with your "simple" code that make it simpler
than what's in -CURRENT and in -STABLE and therefore yield [obviously]
seemingly better times.
1) sleeping in the case of a system exhausted of mbufs and clusters is
now broken because code that frees to this "combined"
Hello all,
I've got an annoying problem here with MPD (3.8).
I use MPD to setup a PPTP session to my adsl modem, but after (approx)
24 hours of being online my Internet connection gets slower and slower.
When I try to do a traceroute or a ping I get some warning: out of buffers
Then I restart MPD
On 1 Jul, Tom Pavel wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm confused about some code dealing with the acceptance of RSTs
> in tcp_input.c. I've gleaned what I can about the history of that
> code through the CVS repository, but I'm still looking for some more
> insight. The code in question requires that a RST ha
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote:
>
> > Here is a trace to illustrate:
> >
> > 09:05:35.956066 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111
> 261 win 4380 (DF)
> > 09:05:36.961787 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 35685
23 matches
Mail list logo
