IPXIP

2002-01-24 Thread Alexander
I have a serious question to ask. I have 2 gamehalls. Both of them are on masq. networks. And I need to make them to play games over IPX. for linux there are a lot of demons for ipx routing, but I don't know what are for freebsd. So here is what I did: 1. on both routers I compiled: opti

subscribe

2002-01-24 Thread Radoslav Vasilev
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Brian: pppoe question.

2002-01-24 Thread Julian Elischer
yep I may want to put a 'pseudo' interface down three instead of a real one, and tunnel it to somewhere else.. :-) On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Brian Somers wrote: > > Brian, would it be possible to specify to ppp, an arbitrary node/hook on > > which to attach the pppoe node? > > Just to see if I unde

ICMP Redirect - does it not belong to the RFCs???

2002-01-24 Thread Reto Trachsel (NetModule)
Hi Crist and net-list > I am not sure of the reason redirects are not sent for the default > route. In your Stevens reference, he doesn't explain any reasoning for > it? As you say, the comment I quoted goes wa-ay back to before the > initial FreeBSD CVS import back to 4.4BSD or earlier. You migh

Re: PPP callback and SecurID

2002-01-24 Thread Brian Somers
You could probably ``set cd off'' to get the desired effect. Alternatively, configure your machine to be able to receive incoming connections and let the initial ppp session drop when the peer hangs up. > I've a problem with my callback. I'd like to automate it somehow, but there is a > probl

Re: Brian: pppoe question.

2002-01-24 Thread Brian Somers
> Brian, would it be possible to specify to ppp, an arbitrary node/hook on > which to attach the pppoe node? Just to see if I understand, do you mean to connect to ``something else'' besides [NIC]:orphan ? - so that another node can be put in the chain ? The netgraph code on the cvs NETGRAPH b

Re: sysctl(3) errnos wrong?

2002-01-24 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
[Redirected to -net] On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 02:27:42AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:52:09AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Sounds like that, but changing it now would be too backwards incompatible. > > Then shouldn't we fix the documentation to reflect reality? >

Re: interface multicast address list

2002-01-24 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:08:14AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020124 00:54] wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > TL>Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > TL>> [Redirected to -net with -hackers Bcc:ed] > > TL>> > is there any way to get at the

Re: interface multicast address list

2002-01-24 Thread Harti Brandt
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: TL>Harti Brandt wrote: TL>> TL>> > is there any way to get at the if_multiaddrs list from user space (except TL>> TL>> > for digging through the kernel with kvm). TL>> TL>> TL>> TL>> I'm affraid not. TL>> TL> TL>> TL>Actually, the easiest way is to rememb

Re: interface multicast address list

2002-01-24 Thread Terry Lambert
Harti Brandt wrote: > TL>> > is there any way to get at the if_multiaddrs list from user space (except > TL>> > for digging through the kernel with kvm). > TL>> > TL>> I'm affraid not. > TL> > TL>Actually, the easiest way is to remember the things when you > TL>set them in the first place. > > Th

Re: interface multicast address list

2002-01-24 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020124 00:54] wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > > TL>Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > TL>> [Redirected to -net with -hackers Bcc:ed] > TL>> > is there any way to get at the if_multiaddrs list from user space (except > TL>> > for digging through the ke

Re: interface multicast address list

2002-01-24 Thread Harti Brandt
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: TL>Ruslan Ermilov wrote: TL>> [Redirected to -net with -hackers Bcc:ed] TL>> > is there any way to get at the if_multiaddrs list from user space (except TL>> > for digging through the kernel with kvm). TL>> TL>> I'm affraid not. TL> TL>Actually, the easie