On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:29:42PM -0600, Len Conrad wrote:
> 4.4-20020101-STABLE with 5 nics
>
> ifconfig_fxp0="inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 media autoselect"
> ifconfig_fxp1="inet 10.1.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 media autoselect"
> ifconfig_fxp2="inet 192.168.253.59 netmask 255.255.255.0
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:22:00PM -0800, Rachel Leising wrote:
>
> --
> I can't seem to get name resolution working correctly.
>
> According to sniffer output, the dns query goes out fine and the
> response comes back just fine. However, my machine then replies to
> the dns server with an IC
4.4-20020101-STABLE with 5 nics
ifconfig_fxp0="inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 media autoselect"
ifconfig_fxp1="inet 10.1.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 media autoselect"
ifconfig_fxp2="inet 192.168.253.59 netmask 255.255.255.0 media autoselect"
ifconfig_fxp3="inet 10.1.4.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 m
--
I can't seem to get name resolution working correctly.
According to sniffer output, the dns query goes out fine and the
response comes back just fine. However, my machine then replies to
the dns server with an ICMP "port unreachable message"... regardless
of the ephemeral port used by my
Hi,
I'm looking for papers or documentation describing SEQPACKET
or RDM protocols. I see that there is a SEQPACKET protocol
under the NS domain which I could just read but a paper would be
best to start with.
Web searches have not turned up much that is
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 03:56:04PM +, June Carey wrote:
> >From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: June Carey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: FreeBSD-4.3 IPv6 bug
> >Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 15:26:45 -0800
> >
> >Can you please:
> >
> >a) Test under a more rece
>From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: June Carey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD-4.3 IPv6 bug
>Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 15:26:45 -0800
>
>Can you please:
>
>a) Test under a more recent version of FreeBSD: bugs are continually
>being fixed, and this may have al
> > I've used bridging with tap devices plenty. Works fine for me.
>
>What bridging method do you use with tap device ?
>option BRIDGE in kernel method OR netgraph bridging method?
Netgraph bridging.
> > TAP devices don't actually work unless there's a process that has the
> /dev/ entry
> > op