On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:20:17PM -0800, soheil hyeganeh wrote:
> hi
> i want to use the compress(dst, dstsize, src, srcsize)
> and i append the lib/libz/compress.c to the
> sys/net/zlib.c and when i compile the kernel
> it takes an error for zlib.c
> a precompiling error for #ifndef _Z_UTIL_H li
hi
i want to use the compress(dst, dstsize, src, srcsize)
and i append the lib/libz/compress.c to the
sys/net/zlib.c and when i compile the kernel
it takes an error for zlib.c
a precompiling error for #ifndef _Z_UTIL_H line:45 and
says that thereis no terminator for that
i want to know why and ho
Hi,
Now I want to use radiusclient ( version 0.3.1 ) under FreeBSD ports
and use radlogin to substitute normal login for PPP login user. I have
ported radiusclient and radlogin works well, but I don't know how to use
radlogin instead of login. Any ideas will be appreciated.
Thanks!
Hi, Now I want to use radiusclient (
version 0.3.1 ) under FreeBSD ports and use radlogin to substitute normal login
for PPP login user. I have ported radiusclient and radlogin works well, but I
don't know how to use radlogin instead of login. Any ideas will be
appreciated. Thanks!
Hi,
Now I want to use radiusclient ( version 0.3.1
) under FreeBSD ports and use radlogin to substitute normal login
for PPP login user. I have ported radiusclient and radlogin works
well, but I don't know how to use radlogin instead of login. Any ideas will
be appreciated.
* Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 07:10] wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > Can people take a look at this fix? It seems to dtrt, but I need feedback
> > here.
> >
> > It basically backs out my last two revisions and changes the hacks the
> > poll call to seeming
Hello, I found something interesting, when opening a routing socket using
sock = socket(AF_ROUTE, SOCK_RAW, AF_INET);
no RTM_DELETE messages are reported, unless errno != 0. When opened using
the last argument == 0 (AF_UNSPEC), it reports all operations.
Is this a bug or a feature, and what'
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:20:51AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
.. deleted
>
> RFC 2581 suggests that 4 is a good value (well, not exactly 4, they have a
> formula which comes out to about 4 in most cases.) I'm inclined to agree
> that something between 2-4 would be a good value for our non-loc
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Can people take a look at this fix? It seems to dtrt, but I need feedback
> here.
>
> It basically backs out my last two revisions and changes the hacks the
> poll call to seemingly do the right thing.
>
> Index: fifo_vnops.c
> =
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:20:51AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> (Moving over to -net, please remove -stable from any cc's)
>
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Thomas Zenker wrote:
>
> > I allways wondered, why the initial slowstart window is set to one
> > (well some years I didn't look into the tcp
(Moving over to -net, please remove -stable from any cc's)
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Thomas Zenker wrote:
> I allways wondered, why the initial slowstart window is set to one
> (well some years I didn't look into the tcp code though). 9 years
> ago I had to develope the firmware for a store&foreward
11 matches
Mail list logo
