I can't get Squid(2.4S2) to operate inside a jail(4.4S) when configured to use
Squid's internal DNS.
I get a log full of the following errors as it repeatedly tries to lookup the
address:
2001/10/12 02:08:49| comm_udp_sendto: FD 4, 192.168.1.3, port 53: (22) Invalid
argument
2001/10/12 02:08:49|
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 03:31:42PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 12:13:59PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > At 06:16 PM 10/11/01 -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> >
> > >If the forwarding path is maxed out, then it is the application layer's
> > >responsibility to back off (thin
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 12:13:59PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 06:16 PM 10/11/01 -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>
> >If the forwarding path is maxed out, then it is the application layer's
> >responsibility to back off (think TCP).
>
> Is it better for the networking layer to deal with this (pote
At 11:42 AM 10/12/01 -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > If you find yourself hitting the queue limit I'd suggest using RED or
> > GRED with ipfw to drop packets more intelligently before the hard limit
>
>we are talking about a different queue here, which is not managed by
>ipfw (now you are actually g
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:56:32AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > Is it better to drop
> > packets when the queue is full and let the various applications behind me
> > figure it out, or is it better to add some latency at the network layer so
> > the apps dont have to deal with it.
>
> If y
At 06:16 PM 10/11/01 -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>If the forwarding path is maxed out, then it is the application layer's
>responsibility to back off (think TCP).
Is it better for the networking layer to deal with this (potentially
introducing some latency) as opposed to letting the application
At 06:30 PM 10/11/01 -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > from pinging the other side of the OC-3 or ethernet connection and
> > > measuring the response time, how can I see how much latency is added by
> > > increasing these buffers ?
>
>of course the latency increase depends on how full are the buffe
Hi,
I tried to run my PC-Card-Network-Card with FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE.
If i insert the card, the pccardd recognizes the card as:
Telecom Device SuperSocket HPC100 inserted.
If the ifconfig is made, then the system hangs completely. If i remove
the card, then the system works.
pccardc dumpcis:
Co
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 12:03:07PM +0200, Jean-Francois Dockes wrote:
>
> I recently configured a diskless FreeBSD machine, and I found the
> handbook section to be outdated to the point of irrelevance.
>
> I wrote an updated version, which I hereby submit for review, as suggested
> by the docum
I recently configured a diskless FreeBSD machine, and I found the
handbook section to be outdated to the point of irrelevance.
I wrote an updated version, which I hereby submit for review, as suggested
by the documentation project 'Submitting documentation' section.
I hope that the text is most
subscribe
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
11 matches
Mail list logo
