hi, there!
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 09:30:33PM -0400, Nguyen-Tuong Long Le wrote:
> I am wondering what is the side effects of increasing FD_SETSIZE
> beyond 1024? Our group have a propiertary web server software that
> handles a large number of sockets. While increasing the kern.maxfiles
> and k
* George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010928 23:25] wrote:
> OK, several people said I should just send this to -net so here you are.
>
> I have a few questions about the direction and code base for the FreeBSD
> TCP/IP stack.
>
> 1) Is there a published list of "TODOs" that y'all are wo
OK, several people said I should just send this to -net so here you are.
I have a few questions about the direction and code base for the FreeBSD
TCP/IP stack.
1) Is there a published list of "TODOs" that y'all are working on to
add/modify the system?
2) How different is -CURRENT from -STABLE?
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
write:
>Hi,
>
>I am wondering what is the side effects of increasing FD_SETSIZE
>beyond 1024? Our group have a propiertary web server software that
>handles a large number of sockets. While increasing the kern.maxfiles
>and kern.maxfilesperproc gives our web ser
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 09:30:33PM -0400, Nguyen-Tuong Long Le allegedly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering what is the side effects of increasing FD_SETSIZE
> beyond 1024? Our group have a propiertary web server software that
> handles a large number of sockets. While increasing the kern.maxfiles
>
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Sending it to -net would work, you might want to cc jlemon and
> silby @freebsd, possibly me as well.
>
> --
> -Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
And jayanth, and jesper, and ruslan, and...
Unless you've found some vulnerability which needs to
Hi,
I am wondering what is the side effects of increasing FD_SETSIZE
beyond 1024? Our group have a propiertary web server software that
handles a large number of sockets. While increasing the kern.maxfiles
and kern.maxfilesperproc gives our web server more connections,
select() seems to fail if t
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 03:01:49PM -0700, Anuranjan wrote:
> I'm a newbie to wireless on freeBSD. I found on some sites people mentioning
> that the PCMCIA-PCI adapter doesn't work on freeBSD as of now(some problem
> in the PCI slot being used for this purpose). Has anyone tried using it this
> wa
Hi,
I'm a newbie to wireless on freeBSD. I found on some sites people mentioning
that the PCMCIA-PCI adapter doesn't work on freeBSD as of now(some problem
in the PCI slot being used for this purpose). Has anyone tried using it this
way? Is there a patch available for this stuff?
I'm tryin
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Shoichi Sakane wrote:
> > When I start racoon on both machines, all appears fine. To make a long
> > story short, Machine A never seems to generate ANY isakmp packets. Machine
> > B's racoon run-time info never indicates it's gotten a phase I initiation
> > from A if the se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is always a good place to send network stack
related e-mail. Another place you might want to consider sending e-mail
to is [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is used for general architectural
discussions. -net tends to catch a networking-oriented audience, whereas
-arch will get more ge
* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010928 21:25]:
> that is NOT running as an AP.
> but of course it will do what you want.
> just don't expect it to work as an AP..
Well, it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck... :)
But you're technically correct, fair enough.
So, anyone know whether
that is NOT running as an AP.
but of course it will do what you want.
just don't expect it to work as an AP..
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Rasputin wrote:
> * Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010928 17:05]:
> >
> > how does a freebsd machine pose as an airport?
> > That requires you run special A
* jayanth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010928 14:43] wrote:
> Yoshi,
> I have attached a patch. Let me know if this fixes the problem.
>
> jayanth
cool, but..
> --- tcp_output.c Fri Sep 28 11:15:32 2001
> +++ tcp_output.c.new Fri Sep 28 12:05:03 2001
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
>* If there is s
* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010928 17:05]:
>
> how does a freebsd machine pose as an airport?
> That requires you run special AP firmware on the card.
Not really, you set up an iBSS and the iBook treats it as though it
were an airport.
You don't get all the power-saving features of a
Yoshi,
I have attached a patch. Let me know if this fixes the problem.
jayanth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > This issue is a combination of mbuf cluster size and the
> > TF_MORETOCOME flag.
>
> > if (len) {
> > if (len == tp->t_ma
I have made a driver retrofit kit available for Broadcom BCM570x-based
gigabit ethernet cards at the following URL:
http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/Broadcom/4.x/bcm570x_drv.tar.gz
This kit contains source and pre-compiled driver modules for FreeBSD
4.3-RELEASE and later. This should make i
* George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010928 10:46] wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I was going to send a more targetted email for information
> on the future plans on the TCP/IP stack for FreeBSD but the web site does
> not have a section (that I can find quickly) on just who the core team
how does a freebsd machine pose as an airport?
That requires you run special AP firmware on the card.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Rasputin wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm about to try to set IPSec over a wireless link (as WEP can't be trusted),
> and just wanted to check I have the concepts straight i
Hi Folks,
I was going to send a more targetted email for information
on the future plans on the TCP/IP stack for FreeBSD but the web site does
not have a section (that I can find quickly) on just who the core team for
networking is. Would those folks please send me an email?
Thanks,
Geo
>Currently the DNS system requires IPv4 transport. If you disable IPv4
>completely, you cannot resolve any hostnames. In this case, you must
>set up DNS proxy (ex. totd) from IPv6 to IPv4. Is this your case,
>isn't it?
Not, because I connected two machine back to back.
Btw, when I set ipv6_for
Hi there,
I'm about to try to set IPSec over a wireless link (as WEP can't be trusted),
and just wanted to check I have the concepts straight in my head.
One end is an iBook which connects to the Net via a FreeBSD
gateway, posing as an Airport.
The FreeBSD box runs ipf and ipnat.
The iBook wil
22 matches
Mail list logo
