Mike, et al.
I had the panic too. The problem is the order of initialization. It only
happened when you compile NETGRAPH support in the kernel instead of using it
as a module. When initialize netgraph a little bit later it works fine. In
netgraph.h there is a macro called NETGRAPH_INIT. I have ch
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Mitch Collinsworth wrote:
> It's not clear what Jushua is asking for, but my guess is proxy arp.
> See arp(8), in particular the -s flag.
Then I will clarify and say that what I want is precisely described in
section 4.7 of TCP/IP Illustrated Vol. 1 (Stevens) and looks like
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Disagree. Packet is either a runt or not a runt. It cannot be
> > inconsistently bridged it to one (trunk) interface but not to (access)
> > interface.
>
> Runt-ness is not a property of the contents of the frame, it's a
> property of
< said:
> Also, who is the VLAN maintainer these days ?
I think that code has a ``sticky hat'', so whoever last touched it is
``it''.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
At 12:54 PM 8/28/01 -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>< said:
>
> > Can anyone tell me why the VLAN code might be causing my switches (ciscos)
> > to see a lot of runt frames when the interface is in 802.1q trunking
> mode ?
>
>It's possible that the Cisco is (bogusly, IMHO) trying to enforce the
>E
< said:
> Disagree. Packet is either a runt or not a runt. It cannot be
> inconsistently bridged it to one (trunk) interface but not to (access)
> interface.
Runt-ness is not a property of the contents of the frame, it's a
property of the wire the frame is sent on. A frame bridged from
another
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > But doesn't the switch have to assume that the VLAN will be attached to
> > some non-trunked ports, in which case the packets must be an appropriate
> > length.
>
> The minimum length needs to be enforced at the output interface.
> (A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joshua Goodall) writes:
> Easy question time, but I can't find it documented. How can I reliably
> (and non-destructively) trigger the sending of a single gratuitous ARP
> reply for some local IP/MAC address?
arping (from ports) and ping the broadcast address.
Terry.
To Unsu
< said:
> But doesn't the switch have to assume that the VLAN will be attached to
> some non-trunked ports, in which case the packets must be an appropriate
> length.
The minimum length needs to be enforced at the output interface.
(A switch would need to do so anyway for locally-generated packe
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 12:54:18PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Can anyone tell me why the VLAN code might be causing my switches (ciscos)
> > to see a lot of runt frames when the interface is in 802.1q trunking mode ?
>
> It's possible that the Cisco is (bogusly, IMHO) trying
I've not been able to get mpd-netgraph to work as a PPTP VPN server on a
minimal freebsd 4.3-Release install.
A minimal install with mpd 3.2 installed from the packages appears to work
fine when configured. no errors in log files etc, however, nmap of the
machine doesn't even show port 1723 as b
< said:
> Can anyone tell me why the VLAN code might be causing my switches (ciscos)
> to see a lot of runt frames when the interface is in 802.1q trunking mode ?
It's possible that the Cisco is (bogusly, IMHO) trying to enforce the
Ethernet minimum frame length on the *de*capsulated frames.
It's not clear what Jushua is asking for, but my guess is proxy arp.
See arp(8), in particular the -s flag.
-Mitch
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 01:47:20PM +0100, Joshua Goodall wrote:
> >
> > Easy question time, but I can't find it documented. How can
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 01:47:20PM +0100, Joshua Goodall wrote:
>
> Easy question time, but I can't find it documented. How can I reliably
> (and non-destructively) trigger the sending of a single gratuitous ARP
> reply for some local IP/MAC address?
>
Under "local", do you mean the IP assigned
nice to ask itojun, thank you.
I wish to establish a configured SIT tunnel between a Linux box and
a FreeBSD box. (host to host only)
By the tunnel configuration on Linux side i give
ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::IPv4-Address on the FreeBSD side.
Automatically appears in the Linux routing table the fe8
>yes itojun, you are right with your remark, on the other side I don't
>see by all available RFC's about tunneling IPv6 over IPv4, how
>can somebody perform it, without such a Link Local Address!
>(In this sense it is very relevant what JINMEI, Tatuya wrote)
for configured tunnels, there
yes itojun, you are right with your remark, on the other side I don't
see by all available RFC's about tunneling IPv6 over IPv4, how
can somebody perform it, without such a Link Local Address!
(In this sense it is very relevant what JINMEI, Tatuya wrote)
I have read about such a tunnel success b
At 01:56 PM 8/28/01 +0200, Hroi Sigurdsson wrote:
>Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> > According to Cisco's documentation, runt frames are a sign of collisions
> > (this is full duplex end to end) in a non switched network, or a sign of
> > broken software ie. the driver. Does anyone know what might be goin
Easy question time, but I can't find it documented. How can I reliably
(and non-destructively) trigger the sending of a single gratuitous ARP
reply for some local IP/MAC address?
Joshua
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> According to Cisco's documentation, runt frames are a sign of collisions
> (this is full duplex end to end) in a non switched network, or a sign of
> broken software ie. the driver. Does anyone know what might be going on ?
I don't know what it is but I'm seeing the same he
20 matches
Mail list logo
