Re: Odd IPv6 behavior when not connected to IPv6 net

> On Fri, 29 Jun 2001 06:12:28 +0900 (JST), > Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: oberman> I agree, but I have made no deliberate changes. I just install FreeBSD oberman> with ipv6_enable="YES" in rc.config. oberman> Internet6: oberman> DestinationGatewayFlags

Re: fastforwarding?

Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The description there isn't very forthcoming. fastforwarding caches > > the results of a route lookup for destination addresses that are not > > on the local machine, and uses the cached route to short-circuit the > > norm

Re: Odd IPv6 behavior when not connected to IPv6 net

> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:19:04 -0700 > "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: oberman> I agree, but I have made no deliberate changes. I just install FreeBSD oberman> with ipv6_enable="YES" in rc.config. oberman> Internet6: oberman> DestinationGatewayFlags Neti

Re: Odd IPv6 behavior when not connected to IPv6 net

> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 04:12:42 +0900 (JST) > From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:52:37 -0700 > > "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > oberman> I run IPv6 on my laptop and my office system. As long as I have an > ob

Re: Odd IPv6 behavior when not connected to IPv6 net

> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:52:37 -0700 > "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: oberman> I run IPv6 on my laptop and my office system. As long as I have an oberman> IPv6 path between the systems, everything is fine. But, if there is no oberman> IPv6 link, packets to ANY IPv6 address simp

Odd IPv6 behavior when not connected to IPv6 net

I run IPv6 on my laptop and my office system. As long as I have an IPv6 path between the systems, everything is fine. But, if there is no IPv6 link, packets to ANY IPv6 address simply go to loopback! > traceroute6 pak traceroute6 to pak.es.net (2001:400:0:11:200:f8ff:fe22:955) from fe80::1, 30 hop

Re: Problem with Cisco Aironet 340 series 11mbs Wireless Card

Eric Parker writes: | > Eric Parker said: | > > I tried that, no dice. It appears that the problem is that the | > > interface card isn't initalized yet to accept the ancontrol commands. | > | > Hmmm... I put an ifconfig an0 up in the first line and that let | > things go just fine. I call the

Re: Am I missing something?

As you haven't seen it you are rather bold in declaring that.. In fact you can do so. You hook into the interface hook for 'all ethertypes' and pass those you don't want back to the ethernet handling code. hopefully we can release it soon. On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed,