Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 02:51:42AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > 6)This adds per-connection state, which is evil
> > when you want a lot of connections: the way to
> > get a lot of connections is to remove as much
> > per-connection st
Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> > Why not combine the two schemes and feed the random
> > per-host data from the cloned route entry into the
> > RFC1948 algorithm? This doesn't solve Terry's objection,
> > though.
>
> That thought had occured to me, but I'm
Hi Archie,
Let me explain a little bit more.
I use mpd-netgraph to establish a PPTP session to my ADSL provider. When the
session is available, ng0 has the public IP address associated with it.
ifconfig ng0 shows:
public IP -> some IP
All the traffic on the public IP address needs to
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:37:15AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> > OK, I read the code. Not to poop the party, but off the top
> > of my head, I have several major objections:
> >
> > 1) You stole the space reserved for the cache status
> >
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 02:51:42AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
[...]
>
> 6)This adds per-connection state, which is evil
> when you want a lot of connections: the way to
> get a lot of connections is to remove as much
> per-connection state as possible, which in turn
>
