Re: SHM objects cannot be isolated in jails, any evolution in future FreeBSD versions?

2016-03-15 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Mark Felder wrote on 03/14/2016 22:07: On Sat, Mar 12, 2016, at 11:42, James Gritton wrote: On 2016-03-12 04:05, Simon wrote: The shm_open()(2) function changed since FreeBSD 7.0: the SHM objects path are now uncorrelated from the physical file system to become just abstract objects. Probably

Re: Jail management

2016-03-15 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Martin "eto" Misuth wrote on 02/25/2016 16:14: [...] - not sure about Miroslav's problems with freebsd-update, but it seems to work pretty well with -basedir /jail/tree parameter nowadays (there might be corner cases) Freebsd-update maintains patches for each file in each jail (if yo

Re: SHM objects cannot be isolated in jails, any evolution in future FreeBSD versions?

2016-03-15 Thread Mark Blackman
On 15 Mar 2016, at 08:34, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > > Mark Felder wrote on 03/14/2016 22:07: >> >> >>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016, at 11:42, James Gritton wrote: On 2016-03-12 04:05, Simon wrote: The shm_open()(2) function changed since FreeBSD 7.0: the SHM objects pa

Re: SHM objects cannot be isolated in jails, any evolution in future FreeBSD versions?

2016-03-15 Thread James Gritton
On 2016-03-15 06:33, Mark Blackman wrote: On 15 Mar 2016, at 08:34, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: Mark Felder wrote on 03/14/2016 22:07: On Sat, Mar 12, 2016, at 11:42, James Gritton wrote: On 2016-03-12 04:05, Simon wrote: The shm_open()(2) function changed since FreeBSD 7.0: the