On Tue, Jan 27, 2015, at 16:05, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2015-01-27 12:23, Mark Felder wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015, at 11:17, Dirk Engling wrote:
> >> On 27.01.15 14:41, Ernie Luzar wrote:
> >>
> >>> I hope the ezjail author takes this thread as incentive to keep his
> >>> utility up
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Allan Jude wrote:
Ezjail still works perfectly fine. It is moderately actively maintained,
it works very well with ZFS. The value of having a single basejail,
rather than multiple is slightly diminished by the fact that we all have
more disk space than we used to, and the fa
--- Original message ---
From: "Warren Block"
Date: 28 January 2015, 17:48:05
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Allan Jude wrote:
>
> > Ezjail still works perfectly fine. It is moderately actively maintained,
> > it works very well with ZFS. The value of having a single basejail,
> > rather than
On 28.01.15 17:11, wishmaster wrote:
> This is not killer feature, this something "imperfection" (sorry,
> Dirk. Without insults).
No offense taken. Everyone has their own requirements and we worked out
that you are not the run-of-the-mill ezjail customer. Fine. No need to
convince others that yo
