--- Original message --- From: "Warren Block" <wbl...@wonkity.com> Date: 28 January 2015, 17:48:05
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Allan Jude wrote: > > > Ezjail still works perfectly fine. It is moderately actively maintained, > > it works very well with ZFS. The value of having a single basejail, > > rather than multiple is slightly diminished by the fact that we all have > > more disk space than we used to, and the fact that ZFS could clone a > > common dataset to save some space, but, when it comes time to upgrade > > the common basejail is useful. The process can be a bit awkward at > > times, but it generally works fine. > > The single basejail is ezjail's killer feature. Agreed, it's not so > much a matter of disk space as of making it possible to upgrade all the > jails at one pass. Really? This is not killer feature, this something "imperfection" (sorry, Dirk. Without insults). And I was forced to migrate to own solution when defined it. Basejail must has not only base system's configs as well as all installed software needed in jails. So, I have 5 jails and only one installation of nginx/php, one installation of MySQL and so on. Just update basejail's software and restart services in all others jails. -- Vitaly _______________________________________________ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
