On 04/11/13 12:48, Dirk Engling wrote:
Dear jail hackers,
in my ongoing quest to understand the direction jail development is
heading, I noticed that per-jail-fstabs are not (anymore?, yet?)
supported by the new jail(8)-rc.d/jail2-combo. Are there official plans
to drop the support?
A nice new
On 11.04.13 22:37, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> I don't know what you mean there.
> You can use per jail fstab in jail.conf
Mea culpa, I was too stupid to properly consult man page on this one :(
erdgeist
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
Dirk Engling wrote:
Dear jail hackers,
in my ongoing quest to understand the direction jail development is
heading, I noticed that per-jail-fstabs are not (anymore?, yet?)
supported by the new jail(8)-rc.d/jail2-combo. Are there official plans
to drop the support?
I don't know what you mean th
Dear jail hackers,
in my ongoing quest to understand the direction jail development is
heading, I noticed that per-jail-fstabs are not (anymore?, yet?)
supported by the new jail(8)-rc.d/jail2-combo. Are there official plans
to drop the support?
A nice new jail+zfs feature is the "zfs jail" comman
Hi, many thanks it is working now, what I did, was to add:
add path 'bpf*' unhide
to the /etc/defaults/devfs.rules, later did a /etc/rc.d/devfs restart
and got it work.
This is how now looks the devfsrules_jail section on devfs.rules
# Devices usually found in a jail.
[devfsrules_jail=4]
add in
have you tried something like this:
rc.conf:
jail_gate1_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail_gate1"
devfe.rules:
[devfsrules_jail_gate1=7]
add include $devfsrules_hide_all
add include $devfsrules_unhide_basic
add include $devfsrules_unhide_login
add path 'bpf*' unhide
_
