FW: [RELEASE] New Boot-Loader Menu bugs?

-Original Message- From: Devin Teske [mailto:dte...@vicor.com] Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 4:45 PM To: 'Andrey Fesenko'; 'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org' Cc: Julian Elischer; Teske, Devin (devin.te...@fisglobal.com) Subject: RE: [RELEASE] New Boot-Loader Menu bugs? >

Re: detailed map of WIRED memory under FreeBSD 9

On Jun 1, 2012, at 1:19 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > what tool and how can be used to display detailed map what exactly wired > memory on my system as it is far way too much (1.5GB out of 4GB RAM). > dmidecode? -- Devin > i do run 4 virtualboxes but one have 256MB RAM, the others 192

Re: /etc/resolv.conf getting over written with dhcp

On Jun 15, 2012, at 5:47 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Varuna wrote: >> Hello Folks, >> >> Noticed a strange issue with the creation / update of /etc/resolv.conf. >> The details of the system that I noticed the issue on is: >> Version : FreeBSD 8.0 >> Patch level: not patched >> Uname: FreeB

RE: Xorg help

(first, apologies for the top-post; using a dumb web-mail client that can't handle inline) Hi, We use LG Flatron at $work (tho not wide-aspect like the model you mention -- read: we run our LG Flatron LCDs at 1600x1200). I've had a little experience in working on higher definitions tho (like 1

RE: rsh/rlogin strange behavior

On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > i use rsh/rlogin regularly within LAN and over encrypted tunnels > it works generally fine but have strange behavior > > when i output long amount of text in console (eg. cat bigfile), where long > is like 20kB it > > a) display part of it and hangs

RE: rsh/rlogin strange behavior

On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > it is FreeBSD 9, em or re or bge hardware but rlogin goes over tun(4) > interface. > > in the same time rcp works fine even for gigabyte file. > > any more ideas? Try to isolate the problem as network or disk or other... systat -iostat 1 netstat 1

Re: Rebooting from loader causes a "fault" in VMware Workstation

+1 you rock. I was silently watching this thread from the start, thinking… Oh gawd, please don't let this be associated with the massive Forth changes I've rolled in (this much I had doubted heavily, but kept a watchful eye just in-case). -- Devin On Apr 23, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wr

Re: GSOC: Qt front-ends

On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Justin Edward Muniz < justin.mu...@maine.edu> wrote: I think the interface to pkgng and freebsd-update are still interesting; at least more worthwhile than the kernel configuration

Re: GSOC: Qt front-ends

On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Justin Edward Muniz < justin.mu...@maine.edu<mailto:justin.mu...@maine.edu>> wrote: I think the interface to pkgng and freebsd-update are still int

Re: GSOC: Qt front-ends

On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Justin Edward Muniz wrote: >>> >>> I think the interface to pkgng and freebsd-update are still >>> interesting; at least more worthwhile than the kernel configuration >>> one. >>> >>> I think the

Re: GSOC: Qt front-ends

On Apr 24, 2013, at 2:33 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: El 24/04/2013 21:18, "Teske, Devin" mailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com>> escribió: > > > On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Justin Edwar

Re: GSoC: PKGNG GUI Proposal Available for Review

On May 3, 2013, at 1:33 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: good for today and future ladmins that cannot type a command. Any USEFUL proposals that add some real functionality? WIth great respect, I disagree with the dismissal that a GUI itself cannot bring value that a command-line tool couldn't othe

[UPDATE] sysutils/bsdconfig snapshot

Hi fellow -hackers@, I've taken a new snapshot of HEAD usr.sbin/bsdconfig and made it available through the ports tree. The last snapshot was almost 12 full months ago, and a lot has changed since then. Most notably, we have the beginnings of the package management module now and we're edging

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

On May 25, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Matt Olander wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: >> >> I heard there was some discussion at BSDCan about the direction of a future >> FreeBSD installer. Considering we currently have bsdinstall, pc-sysinstall, >> and an effort to revive sy

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

On May 25, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > On 25/05/2013 17:15, Matt Olander wrote: >> From my vague recollection, we discussed improving bsdinstall by tying >> it in with pc-sysinstall, which we've been threatening to do for at >> least a year. Also, there was much discussion about Devin'

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

On May 25, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 05/25/13 13:26, Bruce Cran wrote: >> On 25/05/2013 17:15, Matt Olander wrote: >>> From my vague recollection, we discussed improving bsdinstall by tying >>> it in with pc-sysinstall, which we've been threatening to do for at >>> least a ye

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

On May 25, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Dirk Engling wrote: > On 26.05.13 01:07, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > >> I'm not aware of any movement there (on either side of the table). I'd >> personally be very suspicious of an all-sh(1) future -- by far the >> cleanest parts of bsdinstall are in C -- and this is

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

On May 25, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Super Bisquit wrote: > Please don't turn this into an architecture dependent mess. PCBSD is i386 & > AMD64 only. > There's a GSoC project (of which I'm potential mentor) to fix that. However, you are entirely right… we can't in all seriousness even think about usi

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

On May 26, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Super Bisquit wrote: May I- and others- see the hyperlink to the project, please? Absolutely… http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/harshbhatt/1 -- Devin On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Teske, Devin mailto:devin.te

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

On May 26, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > On 26/05/2013 18:54, Teske, Devin wrote: >> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/harshbhatt/1 > > "This proposal is not made public, and you are not the student who submitted > the proposa

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

On May 26, 2013, at 4:27 PM, Dirk Engling wrote: > On 26.05.13 05:42, Teske, Devin wrote: > >> I chose 100% sh for bsdconfig because of a few good reasons… > > First, the partedit tool makes heavy use of libgeom and the structs > returned from that lib, so I've ra

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

On May 27, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On 5/27/13 9:56 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: >> On 27/05/2013 16:48, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>> Why can we not use in the interim use pc-sysinstall on the platforms that >>> it performs best on and use bsdinstall on the others? >> >> Because pc-

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

On May 26, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Teske, Devin wrote: > > On May 26, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > >> On 26/05/2013 18:54, Teske, Devin wrote: >>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/harshbhatt/1 >> >> "This proposa

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

On May 28, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 5/28/13 7:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 05/27/13 23:36, Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 5/27/13 6:53 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 05/27/13 20:40, Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 5/27/13 2:23 PM, Bruce Cran wrote: On 27/05/2013 21:28, Alfred Perl

Re: /bin/sh => STDIN & functions, var scope messing

On May 28, 2013, at 8:07 AM, Reid Linnemann wrote: > > On May 28, 2013, at 7:00 AM, Ryan Stone wrote: > >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Václav Zeman wrote: >> Curious. Which of the two behaviours is POSIXly correct? >> >> I believe that /bin/sh's behaviour is correct. I don't know what

Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction

sion involving unifying the boot loader (a topic in my mind that is unattainable). -- Devin On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Teske, Devin mailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com>> wrote: On May 28, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 5/28/13 7:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 05/2

Re: /bin/sh => STDIN & functions, var scope messing

On May 31, 2013, at 10:59 AM, wrote: > Redirections > and >> don't put it in a subshell. Correct. (note: I made no such insinuation; But thanks for clarifying for others that perhaps were not aware). > Only pipe |, which means only STDIN affects/triggers this behaviour. > Does < operator al

Re: Shell variables containing output redirects

On Jun 20, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > Hello all! > > I have a problem with port JBoss72, which tries to behave as long-standing > port jboss5: > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/java/jboss5/files/jboss5.in?revision=302141&view=markup > > > > In rc run script there is

Re: Shell variables containing output redirects

On Jun 20, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > >> Hello all! >> >> I have a problem with port JBoss72, which tries to behave as long-standing >> port jboss5: >> >> http://svnweb.freeb

Re: Shell variables containing output redirects

On Jun 20, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: > >> >> On Jun 20, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: >> >>> Hello all! >>> >>> I have a problem with port JBoss72,

Re: Announcing: nuOS 0.0.9.1b1 - a whole NEW FreeBSD distro, NOT a fork

On Jul 7, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Chad J. Milios wrote: [snip] >/etc is now a ZFS dataset of its own >How did we do it? >Decades of conventional wisdom says /etc must be on /. >Check it out, discuss the whys and the trade-offs. Well,

Re: Announcing: nuOS 0.0.9.1b1 - a whole NEW FreeBSD distro, NOT a fork

On Jul 8, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Chad J. Milios wrote: > On 07/08/13 00:12, Teske, Devin wrote: >> On Jul 7, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Chad J. Milios wrote: >> [snip] >> >>>/etc is now a ZFS dataset of its own >>>How did we do it? >>

Re: Should process run under chroot(8) still see mounts on the original system?

On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 04:17:02PM -0700, Yuri wrote: >> Currently, mount directories as shown by mount(8) command and >> /compat/linux/dev/mounts from linprocfs(5) still show the original >> mount points as other non-chrooted processes see. >>

Re: Trying to use /bin/sh

On Sep 28, 2013, at 1:12 AM, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 28.09.2013 00:14, schrieb Jilles Tjoelker: >> sh's model of startup files (only login shells use startup files with >> fixed names, other interactive shells only use $ENV) assumes that every >> session will load /etc/profile and ~/.profile at

bash_profile, tcshrc, etc... Oh My!

"Trying to use /bin/sh" thread inspired me to check my home-dir goodies into CVS: http://druidbsd.cvs.sf.net/viewvc/druidbsd/home/ Just thought I'd share. There's some cool stuff if you want to have some fun. -- Cheers, Devin _ The information contained in this message is proprieta

Re: Trying to use /bin/sh

On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 04:36:03PM + I heard the voice of > Teske, Devin, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> xterm -sb -sl 400 -ls -r -si -sk -fn "-misc-fixed-medium-r-*-*-15-*" > ^^^ &g

ZFS Boot Menu

In my recent interview on bsdnow.tv, I was pinged on BEs in Forth. I'd like to revisit this. Back on Sept 20th, 2012, I posted some pics demonstrating what exactly code that was in HEAD (at the time) was/is capable of. These three pictures (posted the same day) tell a story: 1. You boot to the m

Re: ZFS Boot Menu

On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:20 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 29.09.2013 00:30, Teske, Devin wrote: >> Interested in feedback, but moreover I would like to see who is >> interested in tackling this with me? I can't do it alone... I at least >> need testers whom will prov