On 11/10/10 12:41 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi,
I have this cleanup of libkvm sitting in my tree and it needs a little
bit of testing, especially the function kvm_proclist, which is only
called from kvm_deadprocs which is only called from kvm_getprocs when kd
is not ALIVE.
The only consumer in
On 11/15/10 10:12 AM, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:25:42AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
I think the assumption is that userland actually maintains a reference on the
specified object (e.g. a file descriptor) and will know to drop the associated
data when the file descriptor
On 11/15/10 10:38 AM, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:33:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
it was provided for pretty much what you are using it for, so that
the userland caller could
easily associate the returning event with some private information
about the event.
This
On 11/15/10 12:14 PM, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:37:23AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
I don't think it was thought of in the context of reference counted items.
This problem has nothing to do with reference counting, and all to do
with resource ownership.
Con
On 11/15/10 7:35 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:24 PM, wrote:
So, I have Core 2 Duo, runing as i386.
I decided to go for amd64 (it's name, is so deceiving, that I've just
recently, accidentaly figured out, that it can be used, with intel CPUs,
too) :P
8.1 cross build i386
On 12/1/10 12:01 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Hi Dheeraj,
On 2010-Dec-01 04:19:46 +0530, dheeraj suthar
wrote:
Kindly do guide me(as I am new here.) and involve me in some
programming project related to above mentioned fields. Also I am
currently going through project lists on FreeBSD list and wil
On 12/15/10 4:33 AM, Dr. Baud wrote:
Is there a cap on the amount of memory a driver (via bus_dmamem_alloc) can
allocate, other than the obvious physical memory limit minus the memory already
allocated?
well it has to fit into the kernel virtual space too.
this is quite limited on x86 thou
On 1/7/11 4:57 AM, joris dedieu wrote:
Hi,
I need a to bind non local ips daemons that don't
implement IP_BINDANY sockopt.
I'm not sure you need it
you can use the ipfw 'fwd' command to make a locally bound
socket act and look as if it is bound to a non local address
You need to tell us a lit
On 1/9/11 3:01 PM, joris dedieu wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: joris dedieu
Date: 2011/1/9
Subject: Re: binding non local ip.
To: Julian Elischer
2011/1/7 Julian Elischer:
On 1/7/11 4:57 AM, joris dedieu wrote:
Hi,
I need a to bind non local ips daemons that don&#
On 1/12/11 5:26 AM, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to add a new network domain into kernel (and never remove it)
from loadable module. In fact, I did it, but I got following warning
from domain_add(): "WARNING: attempt to domain_add(xyz) after
domainfinalize()". Now, I try to figure out wha
On 1/30/11 11:54 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
no problem with this with clang :)
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:29:41PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
hi there,
i noticed freebsd has a few of the following macros:
#define FUNC(sb)
when you do something like
if (cond)
FUNC(i)
you missed an impo
On 2/10/11 11:22 PM, Da Rock wrote:
"In recent versions of the Linux kernel (post-2.0 releases) a new
protocol family has been introduced, named PF_PACKET. This family
allows an application to send and receive packets dealing directly
with the network card driver, thus avoiding the usual protoc
On 2/11/11 1:36 AM, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/11/11 18:17, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/10/11 11:22 PM, Da Rock wrote:
"In recent versions of the Linux kernel (post-2.0 releases) a new
protocol family has been introduced, named PF_PACKET. This family
allows an application to send and re
On 2/11/11 5:40 AM, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/11/11 19:54, Vlad Galu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Da Rock
<mailto:freebsd-hack...@herveybayaustralia.com.au>> wrote:
On 02/11/11 18:17, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/10/11 11:22 PM, Da Rock wrote:
&
On 2/11/11 4:08 PM, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/12/11 02:48, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/11/11 5:40 AM, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/11/11 19:54, Vlad Galu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Da Rock
<mailto:freebsd-hack...@herveybayaustralia.com.au>> wrote:
On 02/11/11 18:17, Julian
On 2/11/11 4:03 PM, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/12/11 02:37, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/11/11 1:36 AM, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/11/11 18:17, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/10/11 11:22 PM, Da Rock wrote:
"In recent versions of the Linux kernel (post-2.0 releases) a
new protocol family has been intro
On 2/12/11 8:40 AM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Naveen Gujje wrote:
Hi All,
On my FreeBSD 7.2 box, I've two routing tables (FIBs). Fib 0 and Fib 1
(net.fibs = 2).
I have a simple echo client which is the counterpart of an echo server
running somewhere.
If I run this echo client
On 2/12/11 7:45 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Tim Kientzle wrote:
The strategy used by libarchive's recent ISO writer
is to concatenate the file bodies into a temp file
(with minimal padding between entries to meet alignment
requirements) while storing directory information
in memory. The
On 3/10/11 9:13 PM, Subbsd wrote:
Hi.
i have a server with FreeBSD-current (9) kernel and core system that
runs a dozen JAIL-s - some of them is FreeBSD 8x environment , and
part is surrounded on FreeBSD 7x.
My question - despite on COMPAT_FREEBSD{4-7} in the kernel, utilities
do not use those s
On 3/13/11 11:30 PM, shivanth wrote:
Can somebody help me with the details of implementation of the
kqueue and kevent Api's .I need to know about the internals , thoae
related to knotes.
the original paper is the best reference
http://people.*freebsd*.org/~jlemon/papers/*kqueue*.pdf
Thank
On 3/25/11 1:24 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2011-Mar-24 17:00:02 +0800, Jing Huang wrote:
In this scenario, I plan to use both tsc and shared memory to
calculate precise time in user mode. The shared memory includes
system_time, tsc_system_time and factor_tsc-system_time.
This sounds l
On 3/24/11 8:46 AM, Ryan Stone wrote:
At work we cross-compile several kld modules. They just upgraded to
gcc 4.5, but gdb 6.X is not compatible with the debug symbols produced
by gcc 4.5. Has anybody ever tried merging kgdb into a newer gdb
version? Anybody have patches that they can share?
On 3/27/11 3:32 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 26, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Jing Huang wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for you all sincerely. Under your guidance, I read the
specification of TSC in Intel Manual and learned the hardware feature
of TSC:
Processor families increment the time-stamp counter differently
On 4/9/11 2:51 PM, Chris Richardson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi, Chris--
[ ...Reply-to: set to direct towards the most appropriate list... ]
On Apr 9, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Chris Richardson wrote:
I am totally new to FreeBSD. I was involved within project w
On 4/22/11 10:58 AM, Robert Lorentz wrote:
Hi,
I'm very interested in getting started with FreeBSD development. My interests
are wide but specifically core OS, performance, scheduling, cryptography,
perhaps filesystems etc.
I have seen the "Ideas" list and there is some good stuff there but t
On 5/12/11 2:14 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On May 4, 2011, at 1:37 AM, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
Devin Teske wrote:
Hey all,
Proud to bring you version 1.3 which completes the followup
suggestions made by Olivier Smedts (use autoboot_delay instead of
loader_menu_timeout and change dc_seconds to loade
On 5/16/12 5:42 PM, Mark Saad wrote:
All
I am setting up 3 sun x4440 with freebsd 7.3 amd64 . The severs have 4x 4-core opterons and 128G
of ram each . Once the servers boot they are a good fit for what we are doing and preform well .
The odd thing I am seeing is a long delay in boot up . Onc
On 5/17/11 1:35 AM, Zafer Aydoğan wrote:
2011/5/13 Zafer Aydoğan:
Zafer.
Hmm... there seems to be very little interest so far.
Although this tool is mainly useful for developers,
what is the correct mailing list to announce it ?
The service seems to be good but most people who are developers
On 5/17/11 1:17 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 12:56:40 -0700 Sean Bruno
wrote:
Silly thing I ran into today. User wanted to NFS mount a dir inside a
jail. After I groaned about the security implication of this, I noted
that there is a sysctl that looks like it should allo
On 5/20/11 5:32 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Daniel Braniss:
no, Who's on 3rd
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...
On 5/20/11 2:57 PM, Sean C. Farley wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 5/20/11 5:32 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Daniel Braniss:
no, Who's on 3rd
No. I Don't Know is on 3rd. Who's on 1st.
I don't KNOW w
On 5/27/11 11:34 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On May 27, 2011, at 10:47 AM, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Best
To: rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:47:54 +
Subject: Re: Active slice, only for a next boot
On Fri M
On 5/28/11 6:06 AM, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
And how about this:
# boot0cfg -o noupdate -s 1
Now when you choose to hit slice 2, it is only for a this one boot.
Next and each boot, defaults to slice 1
Problem is, that you must see, early bootstrap, to manually choose, so this
won't work on
On 5/28/11 4:06 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 28 May 2011 10:04, "Julian Elischer" <mailto:jul...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>
> On 5/27/11 11:34 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On May 27, 2011, at 10:47 AM, rank1see...@gmail.com
<mailto:rank1see...@gmail.co
On 5/28/11 11:10 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 5/28/11 4:06 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 28 May 2011 10:04, "Julian Elischer" <mailto:jul...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>
> On 5/27/11 11:34 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On May 27, 2011, at 10:47 AM, rank1see...@gma
On 5/29/11 2:53 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On May 4, 2011, at 8:57 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
On May 3, 2011, at 9:06 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Devin,
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 08:45:14PM -0700, Devin Teske wrote:
On Apr 30, 2011, at 8:11 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Devin,
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011
On 6/7/11 12:57 PM, Dieter BSD wrote:
I've been working on fixing problems with printf(9), log(9) and
related functions. Today I tried converting printf(9) to write
to the log rather than directly to the console, unless the log is
not open, in which case the message is also sent to the console.
On 6/7/11 6:33 PM, Dieter BSD wrote:
I've been working on fixing problems with printf(9), log(9) and
related functions. Today I tried converting printf(9) to write
to the log rather than directly to the console, unless the log is
not open, in which case the message is also sent to the console.
Pr
On 7/3/11 7:35 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
__linux__ is exactly what __FreeBSD__ is and dies not identify kernel
but rather Linux as whole OS, whatever that might be these days.
There does not appear to be an universal macro that identifies
environment as using Linux kernel regardless of the res
On 7/3/11 1:16 AM, grarpamp wrote:
Would be nice to be able to set different times in different jails.
All jails would tick in step with the system.
But each jail could have it's birthtime set specifically via jail(8),
jail(2), etc. Either by specification of a specific time, or an offset
from th
On 7/16/11 9:19 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiroki Sato wrote:
Vlad Galu wrote
in:
du> Hello,
du>
du> A couple of years ago, Stef Walter proposed a patch[1] that enforced
du> the scope of routing messages. The general consesus was that
On 7/16/11 5:43 AM, Vlad Galu wrote:
Hello,
A couple of years ago, Stef Walter proposed a patch[1] that enforced the scope
of routing messages. The general consesus was that the best approach would be
the OpenBSD way - transporting the FIB number in the message and letting the
user applicatio
On 9/6/11 8:03 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 7 September 2011 09:32, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Stephen Hocking
wrote:
Am wondering if anyone has done drivers the these sorts of network
interfaces that are offered by VMWare& Virtual box. I know that on
some Linux VM
On 9/16/11 1:30 PM, Charlie Martin wrote:
I need to add some custom static dtrace probes in 7.2 apps; the
online documentation refers only to 9 however. Can someone tell me
how to replace what's done in bsd.dtrace.mk for 7.2?
I' am not sure that user space dtrace suport was available in 7.2..
On 9/19/11 9:17 AM, Charlie Martin wrote:
Dude, you say that like it was an option.
It's understood about the realities of commercial decisions, however,
if you really want to trace APPS
that means user space dtrace and 7.2 just doesn't have the hooks to
do non-kernel dtrace.
As a side not
On 10/4/11 9:51 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Trond Endrestøl writes:
It's in daily use at Gjøvik Technical College (Fagskolen i Gjøvik),
here in Norway. Both the mail and web servers authenticates our users
by LDAP, and nscd certainly speeds up the lookups.
OK. No trouble with clients dying
On 11/16/11 12:55 AM, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Maxim Ignatenko, 2015 21:18:
I'm currently inventing the wheel^W^W^Wwriting a firewall from scratch and
looking for most convenient way to establish communication between userspace
processes and kernel part. Communication pattern best fits to listen
On 11/17/11 11:40 AM, Maxim Ignatenko wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/16/11 12:55 AM, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Maxim Ignatenko, 2015 21:18:
I'm currently inventing the wheel^W^W^Wwriting a firewall from scratch and
looking for most convenient way to establish communication be
On 12/3/11 12:42 AM, Filippo Sironi wrote:
Dear all,
I've a strange problem I cannot understand...
I implemented a piece of code within the FreeBSD 7.2 kernel that basically
allocate a per-thread memory page to store a certain amount of information that
must be read and written without crossin
On 12/3/11 2:37 AM, Filippo Sironi wrote:
I need to access the memory both from user space and kernel space, I cannot do
that (simply) with an mmap or thread-specific storage if I recall correctly.
that's how mmap works.. if you give it pages to expose to the user,
you can still access them fro
On 12/18/11 12:18 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
Hi all,
I'm writing a small module just for fun. I would like to have two variables:
- "pid" of type unsigned int and RW so the user can set a pid
- "process_name" as a string RD that will display the process name
associated to that pid (or a mes
On 12/30/11 9:52 AM, arrowdodger wrote:
Hi. First, let me put a little disclaimer:
I have absolutely no CS education and any degree in science, no idea on how
OS kernels and CPU schedulers are implemented and working. Moreover, i
haven't even know math at the level needed to talk about what i'm
p
On 12/30/11 11:34 PM, arrowdodger wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Julian Elischer <mailto:jul...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
On 12/30/11 9:52 AM, arrowdodger wrote:
- OS kernel calls scheduler functions in some defined order.
The OS doesn't really call the sch
On 1/12/12 6:04 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > I'm currently looking at the source code of ps, but adding
> > a field for the FIB isn't as trivial as I thought because
> > ps only sees struct kinfo_proc (via sys
On 1/13/12 11:00 PM, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to upgrade a system running frame relay over a Sangoma A101 card
and WANPIPE.
Sangoma do not support FreeBSD anymore, so I'm looking for alternatives.
What hardware does ng_frame_relay support now that ar(4) and sr(4) are not in
FreeB
On 1/13/12 4:27 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:44:51PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 1/12/12 6:04 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > I'm currently looking at the source code of
On 1/16/12 3:32 PM, William Bentley wrote:
I also echo John's sentiments here. Very excellent points made here.
Thank you for voicing your opinion. I was beginning to think I was the
only one who felt this way.
[...]
We seem to have lost our way around the release of FreeBSD 7. I am all
in fav
On 1/16/12 10:20 PM, John Kozubik wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Steven Hartland wrote:
I was disappointed to see that 8.3-RELEASE is now slated to come
out in March of 2012. This will be ~13 months since 8.2-RELEASE
and is typical of a trend towards longer gaps between minor releases.
...
On 1/16/12 10:29 PM, Atom Smasher wrote:
so i guess that means that i'm tougher than a typical laptop user...
and instead of making things easier, freeBSD is getting harder.
thing is, when people don't "play" with freeBSD on laptops and
desktops, then they grow up, get real jobs, and don't k
On 1/17/12 10:08 AM, John Kozubik wrote:
Hi Ivan,
[...]
Fair enough. Is it the case that if funds or manpower were made
available, more releases would be workable ? Or are there some
deeper cultural leanings toward having fewer minor releases ?
sure
if you or someone is willing to cu
On 1/17/12 7:39 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
Why is everyone so afraid of running -STABLE? Plenty of stuff gets
MFC'd. Yeah, I agree -- running -RELEASE is difficult. Hell, it's
frustrating to us that VMWare only supports -RELEASE and it took
until ESX 5 to officially support 8.2!
More releases / s
On 1/17/12 9:36 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 1/17/12 4:39 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
Why is everyone so afraid of running -STABLE? Plenty of stuff gets
MFC'd. Yeah, I agree -- running -RELEASE is difficult. Hell, it's
frustrating to us that VMWare only supports -RELEASE and it took until
ESX 5 to
On 1/17/12 12:11 PM, Mark Saad wrote:
Here are My 2 Cents ,
1. Support each release longer, or develop a better way to MFS ( Merge
from Stable ) bug fixes, and driver updates to RELEASE. It always
seams that there are a number of things in X-STABLE I would love to
have in X.3-RELEASE and X.4-REL
On 1/17/12 3:36 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 01:17 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/01/2012 23:46 Ian Lepore said the following:
Now, before we're even really completely up and running on 8.2 at work,
9.0 hits the street, and developers have moved on to working in the 10.0
world.
On 1/17/12 2:41 PM, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:57:19PM + I heard the voice of
Hugo Silva, and lo! it spake thus:
Come to think about it, those days are pretty much gone since 4.x
(incidentally, many of us who've stuck with FreeBSD for this long
think of 4.x as an epi
On 1/17/12 3:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
First, let's do away with the whole, "If you step up to help, your help
will be accepted with open arms" myth. That's only true if the project
leadership agrees with your goals.
"leadership" doesn't really control development here. action does.
We also nee
On 1/17/12 7:12 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Jan 17, 2012, at 7:05 PM, "Matthew D. Fuller"
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:49:02PM -0800 I heard the voice of
Julian Elischer, and lo! it spake thus:
5 was not out on a limb for so long because it was a clusterfun, it
was out there
On 1/18/12 3:32 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
Another possibility is to get some combination of {The FreeBSD
Foundation, iX Systems, ...} to trawl the bug report database in a
more official capacity. The problem there is that this will be a
high burn-out job. I'll bring it up at the next Foundati
On 1/22/12 2:19 AM, geoffrey levand wrote:
Hi,
how would i reboot/halt the system from a kernel module ?
the answer is "that depends"..
do you want to sync the disks first? of just hard reset?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
On 1/25/12 10:44 AM, Matthias Zitzen wrote:
Hello list,
does anybody have an idea, how to obtain the new name of a renamed file after
the note_rename event is fired. I'm not very familiar with
filesystem-operations. I checked the typical functions like stat or lstat, but
these functions are w
On 1/30/12 4:01 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
Hello,
from needs on pfSense a patch for allowing multiple intances of
ipfw(4) in kernel to co-exist was developed.
It can be found here
https://raw.github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense-tools/master/patches/RELENG_9_0/CP_multi_instance_ipfw.diff
It is used in co
On 1/31/12 12:53 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Vadim Goncharov
wrote:
Hi Ermal Lu?i!
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:01:13 +0100; Ermal Lu?i wrote about '[PATCH] multiple
instances of ipfw(4)':
from needs on pfSense a patch for allowing multiple intances of
ipfw(4) in kern
On 2/4/12 9:05 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Natd(8) knows how to deal with multiple NAT instances for different
interfaces, which is useful when you have multiple ISPs.
The problem with it, is that it becomes incredibly hairy to configure
your IPFW rules, in particular if you have other policy t
On 2/6/12 11:10 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Feb 6 12, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 02/06/12 19:37, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2012 17:29:14 Alexander Motin wrote:
On 02/06/12 18:01, Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Feb 6 12, Alexander Motin wrote:
I've analyzed scheduler beh
On 2/8/12 6:09 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:04:09PM +0100, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
E> 2012/2/8 Gleb Smirnoff:
E> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
E> > L> if i understand what the patch does, i think it makes sense to be
E> > L> able to hook
On 2/14/12 6:23 AM, Maninya M wrote:
For multicore desktop computers, suppose one of the cores fails, the
FreeBSD OS crashes. My question is about how I can make the OS tolerate
this hardware fault.
The strategy is to checkpoint the state of each core at specific intervals
of time in main memory.
On 2/14/12 9:27 AM, Rayson Ho wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
but I'm interested in any answers people may have
The way other OSes handle this is by detecting any abnormal amounts of
faults (sometimes it's not the fault of the hardware - eg. when
On 2/14/12 3:51 PM, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Coming back to the multicore issue:
The problem when a core fails is that it has affected more than its own state.
It will be holding locks on shared resources and may have corrupted shared
memory or asked a device to do the wrong thing. By the time yo
On 02/17/12 14:08, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
For me as a user, that would be a much preferable approach, instilled
long ago by Linux. I don't like unused stuff around, and I like to
understand what I am using.
Some build kernel confutation parameters "minimum modules", "medium
modules", "maxi
On 2/20/12 6:32 AM, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/15/12 03:25, Brandon Falk wrote:
On 2/14/2012 12:05 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:57:10AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/14/12 6:23 AM, Maninya M wrote:
For multicore desktop computers, suppose one of the cores fails,
the
On 2/26/12 5:34 AM, Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to hear from somebody who understands this stuff on the relative
merits of blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules for dealing with packets from
unwanted sources. I'm particularly interested in efficiency and scalability.
Thanks
the key is
let's try that again with the right Subject: line
On 2/26/12 1:05 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/26/12 5:34 AM, Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to hear from somebody who understands this stuff on the
relative merits of blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules for
dealing with pa
On 2/26/12 1:14 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Sunday, February 26, 2012 a las 01:05:11PM -0800, Julian Elischer
escribió:
On 2/26/12 5:34 AM, Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to hear from somebody who understands this stuff on the relative
merits of blackhole routes vs firewall drop
On 3/4/12 12:47 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Mar 4, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Phillip Spring wrote:
Dear anonymous open-source enthusiasts friends,
How to echo a string backwards into a terminal?
For example (or something like this):
# echo @_foo_$
oof
Or it could be something else (that's because I f
http://modcult.org/read/2008/2/20/nakatomi-socrates-bsd-9-2
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 3/14/12 12:02 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Maninya M wrote:
Then typed this to force a panic:
sysctl debug.kdb.panic=1
The computer just hung after this, and after waiting for a while I pressed
the reboot button.
It said "no core dumps found" while rebooting.
On 4/2/12 10:12 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, April 02, 2012 12:39:26 pm Yuri wrote:
On 04/02/2012 05:31, John Baldwin wrote:
Hmm, I don't know if the port has it, but I did some work on pstack a while
ago to make it work with libthread_db so it at least handles i386 ok. It
needs to be mo
On 4/4/12 5:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 4 April 2012 01:41, Julian Elischer wrote:
should be in ports?
Not unless someone decides to become the new upstream and make a
release. We do not maintain software in ports.
but we do add patches to make things work on FreeBSD
On 5/21/12 6:47 AM, David Windsor wrote:
Hi,
While doing some research on FreeBSD jails, I came across an item in the
jails' TODO:
- be able to have a separate PID space for it
- be able to specify a separate UID space for it
In other projects, these goals have been accomplished using
On 5/24/12 5:35 AM, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Tim Kientzle wrote:
On May 22, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Tuesday, May 22, 2012 a las 07:42:18AM -0600, Warren Block
escribió:
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Matthias Apitz wro
On 5/25/12 10:04 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 25. May 2012, at 16:48 , Sean Bruno wrote:
I've been toying with the idea of letting jails renice processes ... how
dangerous and/or stupid is this idea?
//depot/yahoo/ybsd_9/src/sys/kern/kern_jail.c#5 -
/home/seanbru/ybsd_9/src/sys/kern/kern_
On 7/31/12 5:02 PM, Yuri wrote:
One of my 9.1-BETA1 systems periodically freezes. If sound was
playing, it would usually cycle with a very short period. And system
stops being sensitive to keyboard/mouse. Also ping of this system
doesn't get a response.
I would normally think that this is the f
On 8/1/12 12:45 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
As for the mbuf meeting, all I can find from it online is:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2012-June/012629.html
actually nothing has happenned on this yet that I know of, which i
On 8/2/12 9:53 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/02/2012 09:44, Garrett Cooper wrote:
The "Watson/Losh connection" worked really well in BSDCan 2010 :).
I wasn't going to mention that, since I didn't want to tell tales out of
school. But the fact that remote participation actually was provided for
"
On 8/7/12 5:24 PM, ali mousa wrote:
Hi,
I have recently published a paper related to Operating System, can you please
check it out http://www.ijcsi.org/papers/IJCSI-9-4-1-77-84.pdf and tell me your
opinion, looking forward to hear from you ?
Certainly interesting.. I will read more of it late
On 8/13/12 3:33 PM, Dan Plassche wrote:
Konstantin,
My apologies for any confusion. Your patch solved the problem on
8.2. Static and dynamic a.out binaries from 1.1.5.1 are working
normally in a chroot environment now.
you will also have to change PID_MAX (spelling?) to be 6
I have consi
On 8/14/12 6:07 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:28:46PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 8/13/12 3:33 PM, Dan Plassche wrote:
Konstantin,
My apologies for any confusion. Your patch solved the problem on
8.2. Static and dynamic a.out binaries from 1.1.5.1 are
On 8/15/12 3:29 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 8/14/12 6:07 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:28:46PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 8/13/12 3:33 PM, Dan Plassche wrote:
Konstantin,
My apologies for any confusion. Your patch solved the problem on
8.2. Static and
On 9/22/12 10:46 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/09/2012 16:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
(Why[*]) Would anyone object to a change like this?
diff --git a/sys/kern/kern_cons.c b/sys/kern/kern_cons.c
index 5346bc3..d17846a 100644
--- a/sys/kern/kern_cons.c
+++ b/sys/kern/kern_cons.c
@@ -384,
On 10/22/12 7:12 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 22 October 2012 03:08, Marko Zec wrote:
The only option I can think of now is to update all of the hotunpluggable
device_detach() handlers to do CURVNET_SET(ifp->if_vnet) before calling
further down into the networking stack, because as you already o
1 - 100 of 1456 matches
Mail list logo
