Any change this can be included officially at some point?
I did not write the code. Just patched it so it would compile in 6.2
Thanks!
Jan
http://www.digitaldaemon.com/FreeBSD/FreeBSD/index.html
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
switching...
Jan
Regards,
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and
Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Jan Knepper wrote:
Any change this can be included officially at
Andy Hilker wrote:
Hi,
You (Jan Knepper) wrote:
Any change this can be included officially at some point?
Yes, this would be really nice. Especially because it would not be
conflicting with using freebsd-update (without an own build server).
Probably should be a configuration
Mohacsi Janos wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Jan Knepper wrote:
Mohacsi Janos wrote:
Hi Jan,
The problem with your patch is the missing IPv6 support.
I know... So what you are saying it does not work?
No. I am saying, that worth considering IPv6 support too.
Definitely... especially
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello,
It may be interesting to mention that yesterday there was a presentation
at the NLUUG (Netherlands UNIX Users Group) conference by Marco Zec, who
once wrote a patchset for FreeBSD 4.11 (and is in the process of porting
it to FreeBSD 7.x) that giv
All, (sorry for the cross post)
Something goofy is going on with a 6.x kernel.
Dual Opteron Server (Tyan motherboard). 2 GB RAM... 2 x 256 GB SATA HD's.
Just upgraded this machine from FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE to 6.2RC# and than
down to 6.1-RELEASE.
For some reason FreeBSD 6.1 seems to be very unstab
# vi /boot/loader.conf
hint.apic.0.disabled="1"
Regards
Tim
- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Knepper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FreeBSD ISP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "FreeBSD Hackers"
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 7:09 AM
Subject:
this beginning to sound like hardware problems?
mario;>
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 17:24, Jan Knepper wrote:
Tried that and started
dd if=/dev/ad4 if=/dev/ad6 bs=1m
Kernel went in panic and automatic reboot in about an hour...
It gets worse... when it does reboot the disk drive will
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 08:24:12PM -0500, Jan Knepper wrote:
Tried that and started
dd if=/dev/ad4 if=/dev/ad6 bs=1m
Kernel went in panic and automatic reboot in about an hour...
It gets worse... when it does reboot the disk drive will not show in the
BIOS, nor does
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 02:24, Jan Knepper wrote:
Tried that and started
dd if=/dev/ad4 if=/dev/ad6 bs=1m
Kernel went in panic and automatic reboot in about an hour...
It gets worse... when it does reboot the disk drive will not show in the
BIOS, nor does
Understood... and exactly as I wrote...
Not impossible, but not that likely...
Thanks!
Jan
Mike Meyer wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Knepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
FreeBSD 5.x branch run on that machine for almost 2 years without a
problem and magically the same ti
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 08:24:12PM -0500, Jan Knepper wrote:
Tried that and started
dd if=/dev/ad4 if=/dev/ad6 bs=1m
Kernel went in panic and automatic reboot in about an hour...
It gets worse... when it does reboot the disk drive will not show in the
BIOS, nor does
Jan Knepper wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 08:24:12PM -0500, Jan Knepper wrote:
Tried that and started
dd if=/dev/ad4 if=/dev/ad6 bs=1m
Kernel went in panic and automatic reboot in about an hour...
It gets worse... when it does reboot the disk drive will not show in
Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Jan Knepper wrote:
Sounds like a bug in the support for your ATA hardware, or your
hardware is broken. The very least you'll need to do is to obtain a
crashdump and debugging backtrace (see the developers handbook) and
CC it to sos@
Th
is not trusted...how to either validate or else to have printf limit
> to its arguments. Any ideas?
>
> _
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share inform
chael C. Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Jan Knepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, FreeBSD ISP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-ve
I figured that much.
What I am looking for is a way to clear the connections still showing LAST_ASK
Jan
Bernd Walter wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 04:51:24PM -0400, Jan Knepper wrote:
Hi!Does anyone here know what to do about this?
Read the
I found the following in one of my many mailboxes this morning.
I thought it was great and really wanted to share it with everyone!
Please, check out http://www.mp3.com/justjouett and play the song "Made In America"
It certainly made my day!
Thanks!
Jan
PS: What is stronger/better:
AWO (Amer
Any one have an idea how to pull the value for 'ticks' (kern_clock.c)
from the kernel?
I have looked into sysctl, but could not find "how to".
I am overlooking something?
Thanks!
Jan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
time and the current time * a
constant factor.
Any ideas? Might patching (adding it to) sysctl be a thing to consider
or would that cause security issue's?
Thanks!
Jan
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Knepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
ue ) / factor;
The problem in the second case however is that I can not seem to get to
'ticks' as it is userland code...
Thanks!
Jan
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Knepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: No, I have looked that those, they
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Knepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: How would they return me the 'value' of 'ticks'?
:
: The problem is... I have a value's somewhere that has been assigned from
: 'ticks', l
David Malone wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:00:02PM -0500, Jan Knepper wrote:
How would they return me the 'value' of 'ticks'?
The problem is... I have a value's somewhere that has been assigned from
'ticks', like:
ptr -> value = ticks;
Maybe
Well, I guess since I have not heard any brilliant solutions.
Could/should I add a query for 'ticks' to sysctl?
Thanks!
Jan
Jan Knepper wrote:
David Malone wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:00:02PM -0500, Jan Knepper wrote:
How would they return me the 'value' of
f (http://www.pianoprincess.com/) voted too though!
Don't worry, be Kneppie!
Jan
--
=======
Jan Knepper
Smartsoft, LLC
88 Petersburg Road
Petersburg, NJ 08270
U.S.A.
Phone: 609-628-4
25 matches
Mail list logo
