As Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> fd0c: hard error reading fsbn 0 of 0-31 (ST0 40 ST1 1 ST2 0
>> cyl 0 hd 0 sec 1)
>> fd0c: hard error reading fsbn 1503 of 1488-1503 (ST0 44
>> ST1 20 ST2 20 cyl 41 hd 1 sec 10)
For this kind of errors, it's hard to recover.
The first one is a `no ad
"Brian W. Buchanan" wrote:
> Any fdc driver gurus in the house?
> I have a bunch of old floppy disks with some text files I'd like to
> recover. Many of them have errors and are unreadable past a certain
> point in the disk. Others I can't read from at all.
I just committed a change to the fd
Several members of the FreeBSD community approached us with different
request regarding Brett Glass' behaviour in our mailing lists. For
various reasons we do not want to `blacklist' anyone from using the
FreeBSD mailing lists, but we remind everybody here to not contribute
to fruitless and often
(It would be nice if you formatted your message with line breaks.)
"Daniel Hilevich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, in the later case, the control messages are = queued to the
> control queue=20 (sp->pp_cpq) which the if_start functions doesn't
> have access to. Should = I implement the acces
Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The BIOS will report a different value for the 2.88MB drives to the
> probe routines...
Actually one out of two possible different values (forgot the actual
once), depending on what BIOS you've got...
--
cheers, J"org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.sax
Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just having installed a 2.88Mb floppy drive in one of my axp boxes
> I wonder if FreeBSD can do 2.88Mb floppy disks. From the looks
> of the contents of /sys/i386/isa/fd.c:
> it appears it cannot.
It cannot. I once tried to hack support for 2.88 MB
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I once programmed low-level FDC stuff under DOS, so I'm a bit
I under CP/M, that's why i wrote the floppy formatter for 386BSD. ;-)
> familiar with this... The difference between 1.44 and 2.88 Mb
> floppies is that the latter use 36 sectors per track
"Daniel Hilevich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my case, although, I want to use the IFF_AUTO (dial on demand)
> option and this is where ifconfig can not help me. In the auto mode,
> the sppp driver should initialize the lcp machine when it gets a new
> message to send.
Did you ever look how
As Julian Elischer wrote:
> of course if you want to be really generic, we've just added the
> netgraph code to -current which implements a lot more than the
> rather specialised sppp code.
Sure, i was only answering a question.
--
cheers, J"org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Softupdates is definitely a viable solution however it does not
> address several issues and the license is not a BSD license so it
> makes me uncomfortable.
Well, Kirk's idea is to put them under a BSD-style license as soon as
possible, so in the long run, you m
Kent Boortz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> semget(IPC_PRIVATE, SEMMSL, IPC_EXCL | IPC_CREAT | 0600))
>
> fails with the error "No space left on device". I tried to
> use a smaller value for SEMMSL but it did not help.
The tunable kernel paramater "SEMMNS" defaults to 60, that's the
maximal n
Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, most of the functionality of dip you
> will find in ppp(8). Note, that it is NOT the same program as Linux
> pppd, to be sure... It has a nice and powerful command-line interface.
Incidentally, i recently considered rem
12 matches
Mail list logo
