On Thursday, 3 November 2011 at 21:05:54 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Thursday, 3 November 2011 at 11:33:25 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Nate Dobbs
>>>
On Wednesday, 18 January 2012 at 19:58:19 -0500, Dieter BSD wrote:
>> The original goal for 5.0 was to completely remove the Giant lock (and
>> do other cool SMP-related stuff). Eventually it was realized that this
>> was too big a goal to fully accomplish in 5.0 (albeit too late in the
>> process)
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 16:27:39 +0200, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 2012-12-10, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>> Unfortunately r205821 [1] has caused several regressions to calendar(1).
>>> Relevant PRs:
>>>
>>> bin/157718
On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 at 3:52:32 +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 16:27:39 +0200, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> On 2012-12-10, Greg 'g
On Monday, 1 April 2013 at 0:48:08 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing this email to discuss the i386 architecture in FreeBSD.
>
> Computers are getting faster, but also more memory intensive. I
> can not find a laptop with less than 4 or 8 GB of RAM. Modern
> browsers, such as Fir
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 19:56:14 -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Bob Bishop wrote:
>> On 16 May 2013, at 21:51, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
>>
>>> I have to retrieve some very old backups. They were made on FreeBSD and
>>> are on tape... specifically DDS4. [et
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 20:56:53 -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 19:56:14 -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Bob Bishop wrote:
>&g
In a few weeks' time I'll be moving house, and it looks as if the new
address currently doesn't have ADSL, so I'll be forced to use
satellite again. I've done some investigation, and the costs don't
look too prohibitive, but almost nobody is prepared to route my /24
net block (192.109.197.0/24).
On Thursday, 30 August 2007 at 21:20:13 +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> # make world
> WARNING: make world will overwrite your existing FreeBSD
> installation, kill your cat and burn your house down...
>
> Now, THIS is quite funny... do you really thing that a person with
> - root access
> - the kno
On Monday, 3 September 2007 at 10:58:54 +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to debug my kernel with modules through serial console.
> I have two machines with 7.0-CURRENT.
> What i do:
> ...
>
> What i've missed?
You're a bit sketchy on the details that I've omitted here. What
happe
On Sunday, 9 March 2008 at 15:27:12 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
> I've stumbled on to an obscure problem with autoconf 2.61, and I'm not
> sure quite what to do with it. I've already sent mail to the autoconf
> folks, but I'd like to understand what's going on.
>
> The problem is that, on a FreeBSD s
On Monday, 24 May 2010 at 21:17:01 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:13:07PM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
>
>> Is the thinking that groff has only been in base to support manpages?
>> If so, this project makes sense. But even so, some clarification of the
>> intent is n
On Monday, 24 May 2010 at 22:43:37 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:17:01PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:13:07PM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
>>> I welcome this change, but groff is used for much more than manpages.
>>> What happens to pic
On Wednesday, 26 May 2010 at 1:21:20 +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 5/25/2010 9:52 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>> BSD has always been ab;e to produce it's documentation as part of its
>>> build
>>>
>>> Please keep this true.
>
> This is what mdocml will be for. I never advocated removing the
> u
On Tuesday, 25 May 2010 at 16:16:10 -0700, Bakul Shah wrote:
>
> If you must kick groff out, why not "port" plan9 troff which
> now does unicode, has 27 macro packages including ms, weighs
> in at about 10K lines of C code written by Joe Ossanna, Brian
> Kernighan, Ken Thompson, Jaap Akkerhuis & ot
On Saturday, 17 January 2009 at 17:57:10 -0800, Kamlesh Patel wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying remote kernel debugging in FreeBSD using serial
> communication. I got the following link.
>
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-debugfreebsd.html#list1
This article is inaccurate in a num
On Tuesday, 2 February 2010 at 13:09:29 -0800, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer. As you note, the damage (or benefit :-) is
> done. Still I have sent an email to the editor at Spiegel notifying
> them of my copyright in the hopes that they will at least ask in the
> future.
FWIW, muc
Last week, at the Linux.conf.au in Dunedin, Van Jacobson presented
some slides about work he has been doing rearchitecting the Linux
network stack. He claims to have reduced the CPU usage by 80% and
doubled network throughput (he expects more, but it was limited by
memory bandwidth). The approach
In the last month or two I've seen increasing occurrences of programs
refusing keyboard input after they've been running for a while
(between hours and days). They still respond to the mouse. At first
I thought it was hardware, but it happens on a number of different
machines, and only with certa
On Sunday, 26 March 2006 at 19:17:19 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-Mar-26 17:50:09 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> In the last month or two I've seen increasing occurrences of programs
>> refusing keyboard input after they've been running for
On Sunday, 26 March 2006 at 1:36:57 -0600, Rick C. Petty wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 05:50:09PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> In the last month or two I've seen increasing occurrences of programs
>> refusing keyboard input after they've been runnin
On Monday, 27 March 2006 at 7:03:23 -0600, Sergey Babkin wrote:
>> Same here. As mentioned in the original message, I can use the mouse
>> to open a new window under firefox. The new window will accept
>> keyboard input, the old one won't. It's almost as if it's deadlocking
>> on input.
>>
>> R
On Monday, 27 March 2006 at 20:30:52 -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
>>> The focus management and the highlighting of the window manager
>>> decoration are not physically connected in
On Saturday, 8 April 2006 at 23:11:59 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been offered a IRIS 4D/210GTX SGI box, and I need to know the
> rough weight, thought as google did not turn up anything and SGI seem to
> disown all the old stuff these days, anyone got any idea on the weight
>
On Wednesday, 31 May 2006 at 8:05:21 -0700, Eugene M. Kim wrote:
> While watching the output of iostat -dxz -w10 -n100 to monitor the
> progress/performance of a dump(8) process straight to a tape, I found
> out something interesting and disappointing at the same time: The disk
> read throughput w
On Sunday, 9 July 2006 at 7:52:32 -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 11:46:53 +0200
> Divacky Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> is it able to somehow make gdb be able to debug fbsd and linux
>> binaries at the same time? I mean.. alter somehow the way its built
>> in buildwor
On Thursday, 20 July 2006 at 18:37:08 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> To resurrect a fairly old thread...
>
> On Mon, 2006-Mar-27 11:23:42 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Sunday, 26 March 2006 at 19:17:19 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>> My work system ru
On Thursday, 20 July 2006 at 6:31:08 -0500, Sergey Babkin wrote:
>> From: Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> To resurrect a fairly old thread...
>>
>> On Mon, 2006-Mar-27 11:23:42 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 26 March 2006
On Friday, 21 July 2006 at 14:32:04 +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>>>> I've been keeping a closer eye on my problem. I'm using fvwm1 with
>>>> click-to-focus and lose-focus-on-screen-switch.
On Friday, 21 July 2006 at 23:38:00 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Friday 21 July 2006 23:02, Robert Watson wrote:
>> I've occasionally also had weird focus problems with KDE. Among other
>> things, it looks like occasionally the mouse release event is lost
>> somewhere in the system (or somet
On Sunday, 13 August 2006 at 23:02:56 -0400, Reed A. Cartwright wrote:
> Freebsd wouldn't recognize my hard drive contoler, so I modified a patch
> I found on the "stable" list, adding all the device ids I found in
> Intel's documentation. Please add this to the stable or current branch.
>
> Below
On Sunday, 16 January 2005 at 17:30:51 +, Linus Caldwell wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 January 2005 at 11:46:35 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I can't believe this.
>> Poul has completely ignored the proposal, time table, sysctl, and the
>> several major figures that supported it and has gone
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Single line message.
On Tuesday, 1 March 2005 at 11:41:08 +0800, River wrote:
> Hi, Everyone:
>
> How can I debug the core dump file created by kernel panic? I try to
> use "gdb -core vmcore.0" (vmcore.0 is 4G file because I ha
I've spent the last hour trying to raise the maximum process data size
(ulimit -d). /etc/login.conf says "unlimited", /boot/loader.conf has
nothing, and I can't find a sysctl that looks like it's doing
something nasty. I've RTFMd and found nothing. What am I missing?
Greg
--
See complete header
On Thursday, 3 March 2005 at 17:40:35 -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:06:22PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> I've spent the last hour trying to raise the maximum process data size
>> (ulimit -d). /etc/login.conf says "unlimited
On Thursday, 17 March 2005 at 19:33:50 +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was unable to refrain from posting this :-)
>
> int i;main(){for(;i["] o, world!\n",'/'/'/'));}read(j,i,p){write(j/p+p,i---j,i/i);}
There used to be a whole culture of this sort of thing. My favourite
one is an anagram
[much irrelevant content removed]
On Friday, 13 May 2005 at 12:45:12 -0500, Sen C. Farley wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2005, Hervé Kergourlay wrote:
>> did you have any idea if the problem will be solve by the FreeBSD team
>> or not ?
>
> I updated my bug report and tried to notify David Xu but the e-m
[severely trimmed]
On Friday, 13 May 2005 at 12:45:12 -0500, Sen C. Farley wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2005, Hervé Kergourlay wrote:
>> Seán C. Farley a écrit :
>>> On Thu, 12 May 2005, Seán C. Farley wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Hervé Kergourlay wrote:
> 4) wait() API
>
> 2 problems,
I'm currently in the position of needing to cut a large program into
two halves and insert a clean API between them. To do this I need to
get a good understanding of how the control flow works, and I'm
looking for tools that might help me. So far I've seen:
- etags will follow the control flow d
On Thursday, 8 September 2005 at 20:41:49 +0530, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
> Hello,
> Has there been any work on porting JFS2 onto Freebsd?
A little, but it never got finished. Hiten Pandya did the work a
while back.
Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
pgp7INCzQdR8S.pgp
I'm just putting the finishing touches on a paper that I'll present at
the AUUG 2005 conference (see http://www.auug.org.au/ for details).
The paper is about using FreeBSD to control the fermentation process.
Normally I put a beastie image at the bottom right of the slides (see
http://www.lemis.co
On Saturday, 10 January 2004 at 18:12:28 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:57 +0100
>> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As much as I would hate to see RF and Vinum disappar from our
>>> source tree, maybe what we need to do is
On Sunday, 11 January 2004 at 0:12:57 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Long writes:
>> All,
>>
>> I started RAIDframe three years ago with the hope of bringing a proven
>> and extensible RAID stack to FreeBSD. Unfortunately, while it was made
>> to work pret
On Sunday, 11 January 2004 at 12:08:24 +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:46:49 +1030
> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [missing attribution to phk]
>>> I'd say lets kick them both into perforce and
On Wednesday, 14 January 2004 at 22:32:32 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lukas Ertl writes:
>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Robert Watson wrote:
>>
>>> I think the right strategy is to follow the minimalist approach now
>>> (adopt the disk(9) API, rather than having Vinum
On Tuesday, 20 January 2004 at 14:51:08 +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>
>> Lukas Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> following the recent discussion about GEOM and Vinum I wrote some
>>> proof-of-concept code, or rather, I copy'n'pasted the necessary st
On Wednesday, 21 January 2004 at 12:35:52 +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And to answer another message: yes, Vinum on FreeBSD *must*
>> be adapted to GEOM. There's no other solution.
>
> shouldn't we
On Tuesday, 3 February 2004 at 11:55:42 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Sridhar Chellappa wrote:
>
>> How do we debug a freeBSD kernel ? Do we have something similar to
>> "KGDB" that linux offers ?
>
> there is a whole chapter in the handbook about this..
Unfortunately, it'
On Saturday, 21 February 2004 at 22:43:21 +0100, Burkard Meyendriesch wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> for my new -CURRENT box I have to decide wether to use vinum(8) or
> the on-board capabilities of my Asus K8V Deluxe motherboard. Which
> solution would you recommend?
Well, I'd use Vinum, of course. Yo
On Friday, 5 March 2004 at 13:43:04 -0500, Chungwei Hsiung wrote:
> Hello..
> I am super new to this list, and I have a simple question that I don't
> know why it does that. I have a simple test program. I compile it, and
> gdb to disassemble main. I got the following..
>
> 0x80481f8 : push
On Friday, 5 March 2004 at 18:43:11 -0500, Chungwei Hsiung wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 5 March 2004 at 13:43:04 -0500, Chungwei Hsiung wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello..
>>> I am super new to this list, and I have a simple quest
On Tuesday, 30 March 2004 at 0:32:38 -0300, Joo Carlos Mendes Lus wrote:
>Sorry for the cross-posting, but nor the Author nor freebsd-bugs did
> acknowledge my message, and I think this is a very serious bug in vinum,
> leading to loss of data...
>
> If these are not the correct foruns for
be a
> very complex check.
Well, the minimum correct solution is to return an error if somebody
tries to access the inaccessible part of the volume. That should
happen, and I'm confused that it doesn't appear to be doing so in this
case.
On Tuesday, 30 March 2004 at 11:07:55 -0300, Jo
On Tuesday, 20 April 2004 at 3:17:56 -0500, William M. Grim wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible to do remote debugging of the FreeBSD kernel over a
> serial connection using Linux? FreeBSD has a special "-k" switch that
> Linux does not for GDB; so, I'm not even sure it's possible without a
> lot of
On Sunday, 25 April 2004 at 20:42:07 +0200, GiZmen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have problem with gdb. When i start gdb as a regular user or even user
> i wheel group, i cant debug program that i want. I start gdb with my program
> and i set breakpoint and i run this program. And i do not stop i this
> br
More by accident than by design, I find myself the owner of a Samsung
PS/2 Cordless Mouse. To make identification easier, it doesn't have a
model number, so I assume it's the only one they made.
This mouse has five buttons: the normal three on top, and one on each
side. I can't find a way to get
On Tuesday, 17 August 2004 at 11:13:17 -0500, Sean Farley wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> This mouse has five buttons: the normal three on top, and one on each
>> side. I can't find a way to get the side buttons to work, and l
On Tuesday, 17 August 2004 at 20:18:42 -0500, Sean Farley wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, 17 August 2004 at 11:13:17 -0500, Sean Farley wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>>
>>
On Wednesday, 8 September 2004 at 11:01:33 -0700, Jerry Toung wrote:
> Good morning Greg,
> I am trying to debug a kld that I wrote that keeps causing panics. I already
> did a search on the mailing list, and the only useful info I got was an email
> you replied to in 1999, "Re: debugging a panic
On Monday, 30 August 2004 at 14:11:49 -0400, Rob Deker wrote:
>
> Stephan Uphoff wrote:
>
>> Are you sure that your serial line is configured with the right
>> baud rate?
>
> This may seem a stupid question, but how do I set the baudrate on
> the port and in gdb?
The default bit rate is 9600 bps.
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Important output wrapped.
On Friday, 17 September 2004 at 17:02:58 -0700, Jerry Toung wrote:
> Hello list,
> Could somebody tell me why I can't "list" the source code of this kld?
> I built the module with COPTS=-g, it is loaded
On Monday, 27 September 2004 at 11:07:21 -0700, Jerry Toung wrote:
> Good morning list,
> I CAN connect to the target but the 'bt" command return #0 0x in ??
> () at the remote.
That suggests that you're not connected.
> So this is what I am doing, hopefully somebody can tell me what I a
On Thursday, 7 October 2004 at 0:31:33 +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some problems with printing from kernel.
> At first I think that my problems was cause I use printf,
> but changed all of them to log cause it safe to use from
> interrupt handlers. The situation become bett
On Wednesday, 19 February 2003 at 9:22:18 -0800, Wes Peters wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 February 2003 22:36, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>
>> I see this as a major advantage of arc4random() - if I want 32-bit
>> random numbers I don't have to call random() twice and merge the
>> results. I've never understoo
On Wednesday, 12 March 2003 at 22:27:42 -0500, Yaoping Ruan wrote:
> Does any one know the implementation of "ktrace" in FreeBSD? I would
> like to hack the source code and have a relatively easy way to copy
> the kernel stack image when a certain of thing happens, such as page
> fault. It should w
I've been neglecting Vinum for some time now: I have been very busy.
Times are now changing, and I hope to have time to work on Vinum in
the near future. To start off, I have created a mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I invite you to sign up: send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'sub
On Friday, 30 May 2003 at 18:21:53 -0400, Michael G. Jung wrote:
> After a reboot on 4.8 I ended up with a degraded raid 5 partition...
>
> The only thing special about my setup is 4944 drives spread over 3 channels,
> running SMP kernel.
That's a lot of drives.
> One sub disk was down an
On Tuesday, 17 June 2003 at 6:08:06 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Martin Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Will the FreeBSD project issue an offical statement relating to these
>> allegations?
>> What will happen to FreeBSD if SCO aims at the BSD
On Tuesday, 17 June 2003 at 20:41:00 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Most of the "Bell Telephone" lines were indeed copyrights. Or did you
>&g
On Tuesday, 17 June 2003 at 20:24:29 -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> Josef Grosch writes:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:01:38PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 17 June 2003 at 6:08:06 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>>>> In message: <[EMAIL
On Wednesday, 18 June 2003 at 2:38:34 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> Yes, it reminded me of that thread, but wkt was actually referring to
>> System III, not 32V.
>
> I am also pretty certain that it was widely stated at the time
> th
On Thursday, 19 June 2003 at 1:29:37 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 18 June 2003 at 2:38:34 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
>>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>>> Yes, it reminded me of that thread, but wkt
On Thursday, 31 July 2003 at 23:14:52 +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> still here with my netgraph node.
>
> Today, after a couple of nice days without a problem,
> i spent the last 4 hours trying to understand why the hell,
> my module crash my stable box.
> ...
> #0 dumpsys () at /usr
On Wednesday, 13 August 2003 at 10:36:01 +1000, Michael Day wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> A few months ago I saw that some people were having probs finding a
> driver for the 440x network card installed on some onboard
> motherboards. Has anyone had any luck in finding drivers for these
> cards as I now ha
My main machine has just fried a southbridge, and I'm looking for a
replacement. From what I can see, in the AMD range, the current best
performer is the nVIDIA nForece2. I've read Bill Paul's description
of the problems with the onboard NIC, and if I buy one of these
boards, I'll certainly swell
On Tuesday, 26 August 2003 at 20:31:22 +0100, Duncan Barclay wrote:
>
> On 26-Aug-2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Greetings;
>>
>> Wondering whatever further may have come of this discussion regarding
>> FreeBSD support of the built-in ethernet for the Dell Inspiron 8500 Notebook.
>> Running a dua
On Monday, 29 September 2003 at 12:45:35 -0700, Tony A, Fields wrote:
> Thanks for your effort to get the nVidia folks to pony up the
> documentation. I unfortunately purchased a system that has a motherboard
> that uses the MCP2 network adapter chip set. I now have to rethink how I am
> going to c
On Monday, 6 October 2003 at 21:46:24 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 6 Oct 2003 at 19:10, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
>> Is your mailer screwed up? We're getting duplicates (a few
>> days later).
>
> I don't think so. Could they have been moderated? What do the
> headers say?
Somebody in France ha
On Friday, 5 April 2002 at 14:18:38 -0800, Doug White wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Alessandro de Manzano wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:00:05PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>> Wow, thanks for the super-fast answer! :))
>>
>>
on my production servers' kernel so in the very rare c
On Saturday, 6 April 2002 at 23:40:45 -0800, Doug White wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>>> Note that the kernel binary with debugging symbols is left in
>>> /sys/compile/MYKERNEL/kernel.debug while the actual kernel is stripped
&g
On Saturday, 20 April 2002 at 15:33:15 -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> I've been having problems with a machine locking up while running X11,
> and the usual console break sequence doesn't work. Is there a way to
> break to the kernel debugger from X11?
No.
> Or am I stuck with wiring up a se
On Monday, 22 April 2002 at 19:53:06 -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>> That fix relies on the extensive PAM updates in -CURRENT however; in
>> -STABLE it can probably be similarly replicated via appropriate tweaking
>> of sshd (?).
>
> Why not fix it in stable by the very simple tweaking of the
> Ch
On Tuesday, 23 April 2002 at 10:09:51 +0200, Jochem Kossen wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 April 2002 05:46, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Monday, 22 April 2002 at 19:53:06 -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>>>> That fix relies on the extensive PAM updates in -CURRENT
On Tuesday, 23 April 2002 at 12:06:01 +0200, Jochem Kossen wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 April 2002 11:04, you wrote:
> [...]
I've been noticing a continuing trend for more and more "safe"
configurations the default. I spent half a day recently trying to
find why I could no longer op
On Tuesday, 23 April 2002 at 11:13:42 -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 22 April 2002 at 19:53:06 -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>>>> That fix relies on the extensive PAM updates in -CURRENT howeve
On Tuesday, 23 April 2002 at 16:35:55 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Frank Mayhar wrote:
>> Terry Lambert wrote:
>>> FWIW: I wouldn't object to a firewall rule that disallowed remote
>>> TCP connections to the X server by default, if the firewall is
>>> enabled. I think we al
On Tuesday, 23 April 2002 at 21:38:38 -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>>> A more conservative default configuration results in a material
>>> improvement in system security.
>>
>> *snip*
>
> B
On Wednesday, 24 April 2002 at 12:06:39 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:14:44PM +0200, Miguel Mendez wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:05:29AM +1000, Joshua Goodall wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:52:18PM +0200, Miguel Mendez wrote:
>>> However you present the
On Wednesday, 24 April 2002 at 3:16:43 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> The X11 we are talking about here is not "the default X11", which is
> a set of distfiles, but a "ports" X11, which is not, but which is
> likely to be the basis of future distfiles.
Correct.
> So we are really talking about
On Wednesday, 24 April 2002 at 7:27:55 -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:06:55AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> I think the issue here is that individuals make this kind of decision.
>> We need a broader consensus for this kind of
On Friday, 31 May 2002 at 2:31:32 +0200, Morsal Rodbay wrote:
> I recenetly bought an Athlon XP 1800+... and it turned out that it wouldnt
> run XFree. Everything worked well besides X. Since a workstation without X
> is useless I was forced to switch to WinXP and it's very stable so there is
> n
On Wednesday, 19 June 2002 at 1:16:26 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I have a bunch of 8" floppies I need to try to recover contents
> from, is there anybody out there who has a 8" drive they'd be willing
> to part with for $$ ?
Sure, I have a pile of them (DSDD) somewhere.
> If it comes w
On Monday, 8 July 2002 at 14:46:29 -0700, Kent Stewart wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>> One of my FreeBSD development boxes had a hernia last week when it lost
>> power while writing to disk. The drive wrote out garbage to a track.
>>
>> I want to reformat the drive, (low level) but the bios
On Sunday, 21 July 2002 at 17:42:17 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Willcox writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 01:32:13AM +0100, Paul Richards wrote:
>>>
>>> I wonder how true that is these days. The last time I used nroff was for my
>>> masters thesis which w
On Wednesday, 24 July 2002 at 21:31:56 +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:58:23AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> IMO the tags aren't the problem with DocBook. It's just *really*
>> difficult to get good-looking results with.
>
>
On Sunday, 18 August 2002 at 7:23:31 -0700, Alfred Pythonstein wrote:
> Mad propz to Hiten 'imbecile' Pandya, btw...
>
> It is official -- Netcraft is now confirming: *BSD is dying
Mike, is that you?
> You don't need to be a Kreskin [amdest.com] to predict *BSD's future. The
> hand writing is o
On Sunday, 18 August 2002 at 2:19:35 -0700, Alfred Pythonstein wrote:
> The End of FreeBSD
>
> [ed. note: in the following text, former FreeBSD developer Mike Smith gives
> his reasons for abandoning FreeBSD]
Former hacker? Did I miss something?
[Old news omitted]
> --
> To announce that ther
On Friday, 23 August 2002 at 15:58:17 -0500, Doug Swarin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 09:20:02PM +0100, Peter Edwards wrote:
>> "Peter Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Urgh. Forget it, I was seeing references to rq that weren't there.
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Ok, I'm up to my neck in code I've
On Friday, 6 September 2002 at 12:23:13 -0600, Stacy Millions wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
>> On 06-Sep-2002 Stacy Millions wrote:
>
>>> At the moment, the whole area of Bus Resources is causing me greif,
>>> my panic rate is about 4 or 5 panics/hour (but I'm sure, with some
>>> coaching, I could
On Saturday, 7 September 2002 at 10:28:27 +0200, Christian Zander wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 12:56:12AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>
>>> What I found to work well is remote GDB debugging with the UDP
>>> wrapper (ip-gdb), it responds to CTRL-C as expected.
>>
>> huh? do we have that?
>>
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
