Hi!
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 05:38:58PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> # make buildkernel ... KERNFAST=1
Is it documented somewhere? I was using NO_CLEAN=1.
--
Jeremie Le Hen
Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
__
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:28:48AM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 05:38:58PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> >
> > # make buildkernel ... KERNFAST=1
>
> Is it documented somewhere? I was using NO_CLEAN=1.
>
Yep, build(7).
--
Mateusz Guzik
_
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 16/11/2012 16:41 Attilio Rao said the following:
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> on 16/11/2012 14:30 Attilio Rao said the following:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 16/11/2012
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 16/11/2012 16:41 Attilio Rao said the following:
>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 16/11/2012 14:30 Attilio Rao said the following:
> On Fri, Nov 1
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:39:55PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On 11/15/12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On 15 November 2012 05:27, Giovanni Trematerra
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I really do think that is a very bad idea.
> >> When a locking assertion fails you have just to stop your mind and
> >> think what
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:39:55PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On 11/15/12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> > On 15 November 2012 05:27, Giovanni Trematerra
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> I really do think that is a very bad idea.
>> >> When a locki
on 25/11/2012 14:29 Attilio Rao said the following:
> I think the patch you propose makes such effects even worse, because
> it disables interrupts in generic_stop_cpus().
> What I suggest to do, is the following:
> - The CPU which wins the race for generic_stop_cpus also signals the
> CPUs it is w
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:42:16PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek
> wrote:
> > WITNESS is a development tool. We don't ship production kernels with
> > WITNESS even compiled in. What is more efficient use of developer time:
> > going through full
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:42:16PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek
>> wrote:
>> > WITNESS is a development tool. We don't ship production kernels with
>> > WITNESS even compiled in. W
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 01:37:19PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:42:16PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek
> >> wrote:
> >> > WITNESS is a development tool.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 01:37:19PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:42:16PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:39 PM, P
and
- what are the man differences between the old and new ways.
and it is starting to turn into a flame/bikeshed.
i just don't see what's wrong in SIMPLE procedure that just use existing C
compiler and just sys sources
Thanks for the information. I'll restore the documentation with
update
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 25/11/2012 14:29 Attilio Rao said the following:
>> I think the patch you propose makes such effects even worse, because
>> it disables interrupts in generic_stop_cpus().
>> What I suggest to do, is the following:
>> - The CPU which wins t
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 01:48:23PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 01:37:19PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:42:1
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 01:48:23PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 01:37:19PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Pa
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:42:16PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek
>> wrote:
>> > WITNESS is a development tool. We don't ship production kernels with
>> > WITNESS even compiled in. W
on 25/11/2012 16:01 Attilio Rao said the following:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 25/11/2012 14:29 Attilio Rao said the following:
>>> I think the patch you propose makes such effects even worse, because
>>> it disables interrupts in generic_stop_cpus().
>>> What I
On Nov 24, 2012, at 8:01 PM, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
>
> On 2012-11-24, at 4:47 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 24, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/11/24 Tim Kientzle
>>> On Nov 7, 2012, at 8:09 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
>>>
> Such expe
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 25/11/2012 16:01 Attilio Rao said the following:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> on 25/11/2012 14:29 Attilio Rao said the following:
I think the patch you propose makes such effects even worse, because
>>>
on 25/11/2012 20:05 Attilio Rao said the following:
> If you really want to do something like that please rename
> s/generic_stop_cpus/generic_stop_butself() or similar convention and I
> may be not opposed to it.
As we discussed before, anything else besides "all but self" does not make
sense. S
Hi. Can you please point me to some discussions and solutions related
to this problem? Thanks.
On Sun Nov 25 02:43:10 2012, Kim Culhan wrote:
On Sat, November 24, 2012 1:08 pm, trafdev wrote:
> Hi. I've a dedicated stand-alone FreeBSD server:
> > uname -a
> FreeBSD trafd-website-freebsd 9.0-RE
On Nov 11, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 11 November 2012 12:39, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
>
>> At the moment HDMI output works only in a sense of video output for simple
>> frame buffer. I'm trying to get GPU support ported but not sure how much time
>> it will take. Eventually
The reason I haven't yet committed it is I'd like to sit down with
Attilio one-on-one and figure out the _right_ way to do this.
There's a time for shit-stirring and a time for getting stuff done;
this is neither of those times. I don't mind taking my time on this
one.
Adrian
__
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 25/11/2012 20:05 Attilio Rao said the following:
>> If you really want to do something like that please rename
>> s/generic_stop_cpus/generic_stop_butself() or similar convention and I
>> may be not opposed to it.
>
> As we discussed before
grarpamp writes:
> Any of hundreds of committer and admin accounts could be compromised
> with the attacker silently editing the repo.
FUD. Committer accounts don't have direct access to the repo.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:19:53PM +, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Author: ed
> Date: Thu Nov 22 15:19:53 2012
> New Revision: 243405
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243405
> Log:
> MFC r229848:
> Add aligned_alloc(3).
> The C11 folks reinvented the wheel by introducing an
Hi,
The attached patch adds 'not' functionality to the interactive u command
in top so one can select all processes not owned by a user. This happens
when the username is prefixed with a minus. Example display for -root:
CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.9% idle
Me
Basically I would like to get kernel backtrace of a bunch of threads from the
live kernel under some conditions. When the condition is seen I would like to
run kgdb, collect kernel backtrace of specific threads and exit. Is there a way
run kgdb in batch mode ? Or any other way to get the stack t
On 2012-11-25, at 9:32 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On Nov 24, 2012, at 8:01 PM, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2012-11-24, at 4:47 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>
>>
.. skipped ..
>> Tim,
>>
>> I'm almost done with getting kernel working with latest raspberry Pi
>> firmware. Just ne
29 matches
Mail list logo
