Hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> I'm sorry you feel that way.
>
> Honestly, though, I think you'll be more pissed when you find out that the
> N:1 interface that you want is being done in the wrong domain. But I've been
> wrong before and look forward to seeing your re
On Tuesday, July 03, 2012 11:20:49 pm Yuri wrote:
> On 05/27/2012 13:08, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Perhaps you can try asking on official nVidia FreeBSD forum:
> >
> > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=47
>
> I reported there 05-28-12, but got no response.
> Do you know if t
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 3:01:36 am Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> > I'm sorry you feel that way.
> >
> > Honestly, though, I think you'll be more pissed when you find out that the
N:1 interface that you want is being done in the wrong dom
[ Adding alc@ for VM stuff, Warner for arm/mips bus dma brokenness ]
On Sunday, July 08, 2012 7:05:16 am Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-Jul-03 21:17:53 +1000, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
> >I have a reasonably recent 8-stable/amd64 system (r237444) with a "ATI
> >Radeon HD 2400 Pro", xorg-server-1.10.6,1
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:00:47 pm Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 14:52 -0500, Paul Albrecht wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry about this repost but I'm confused about the responses I received
> > in my last post so I'm looking for some clarification.
> >
> > Specifically, I though I co
On Jul 12, 2012, at 6:01 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> New-bus is certainly not the only way to organize a device hierarchy and is
> not perfect, but in your case I suggest you tone down your language until you
> have enough information to develop an informed opinion.
It is also not the only way to
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 08:34 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:00:47 pm Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 14:52 -0500, Paul Albrecht wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Sorry about this repost but I'm confused about the responses I received
> > > in my last post so I'm l
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:57:16 am Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 08:34 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:00:47 pm Ian Lepore wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 14:52 -0500, Paul Albrecht wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry about this repost but I'm co
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:57:16 am Ian Lepore wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 08:34 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:00:47 pm Ian Lepore wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 14:52 -0500, Paul Albrecht wrote:
>> >
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:08:47 am Davide Italiano wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:57:16 am Ian Lepore wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 08:34 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:00:47 pm Ian Lepore wrot
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 17:08 +0200, Davide Italiano wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:57:16 am Ian Lepore wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 08:34 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:00:47 pm Ian Lepore wrote:
>
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 09:26 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:57:16 am Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 08:34 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:00:47 pm Ian Lepore wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 14:52 -0500, Paul Albrecht wrote:
Good Morning!
This was also posted to the FreeBSD forums:
I have been researching CVE-2012-0217 and while I have patched the kernels
on servers with 7.3/8.2 that I have, I would like to see if anyone knows
for sure if 6.2/6.3 are also vulnerable? I am aware that those kernels are
out of support f
On 9 July 2012 02:49, David Xu wrote:
> On 2012/07/08 18:21, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> Hi all / David,
>>
>> doxygen has been failing for a while now on -CURRENT and apparently
>> -STABLE too. The current fix is disabling one of the tests in the
>> build, but obviously it points to a problem with o
Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > I'm using the following modification of Sean's patch:
This way it seems to work as expected:
diff --git a/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/Makefile
b/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/Makefile
index 456efd1..628583b 100644
--- a/sys
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:40 -0500, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 17:08 +0200, Davide Italiano wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:57:16 am Ian Lepore wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 08:34 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
on 12/07/2012 21:17 Fabian Keil said the following:
> Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using the following modification of Sean's patch:
>
> This way it seems to work as expected:
>
> diff --git a/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/Makefile
> b/sys/module
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 12/07/2012 21:17 Fabian Keil said the following:
> > Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm using the following modification of Sean's patch:
> >
> > This way it seems to work as expected:
> >
> > diff --git a/sys/module
on 12/07/2012 22:36 Fabian Keil said the following:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> on 12/07/2012 21:17 Fabian Keil said the following:
>>> Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:
> I'm using the following modification of Sean's patch:
>>>
>>> This way it se
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 12/07/2012 22:36 Fabian Keil said the following:
> > Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >
> >> on 12/07/2012 21:17 Fabian Keil said the following:
> >>> Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> >>>
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > I'm using the following modification
On Jul 12, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 12/07/2012 22:36 Fabian Keil said the following:
>> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> on 12/07/2012 21:17 Fabian Keil said the following:
Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
>> I'm using the fo
on 12/07/2012 22:44 Fabian Keil said the following:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> on 12/07/2012 22:36 Fabian Keil said the following:
>>> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
on 12/07/2012 21:17 Fabian Keil said the following:
> Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wro
On 07/12/12 09:36, Bill Crisp wrote:
Good Morning!
This was also posted to the FreeBSD forums:
I have been researching CVE-2012-0217 and while I have patched the kernels
on servers with 7.3/8.2 that I have, I would like to see if anyone knows
for sure if 6.2/6.3 are also vulnerable? I am aware
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 06:47 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> that is what i need.
>
> but still need some explanation after using it and reading manual
>
> say:
>PID STARTEND PRT RES PRES REF SHD FL TP PATH
> 1378 0x40 0x5ac000 r-x 385
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> hack...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ian Lepore
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 6:42 PM
> To: Wojciech Puchar
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: /proc filesystem
>
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 06:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 04:41:58PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 06:47 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > that is what i need.
> >
> > but still need some explanation after using it and reading manual
> >
> > say:
> >PID STARTEND PRT RES PRES RE
On 07/12/2012 07:26, John Baldwin wrote:
[ Adding alc@ for VM stuff, Warner for arm/mips bus dma brokenness ]
When the code underlying contigmalloc() fails in its initial attempt to
allocate memory and proceeds to launder and reclaim pages, it should
almost certainly do as the page daemon doe
27 matches
Mail list logo
