on 12/07/2012 22:36 Fabian Keil said the following:
> Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> on 12/07/2012 21:17 Fabian Keil said the following:
>>> Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm using the following modification of Sean's patch:
>>>
>>> This way it seems to work as expected:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/Makefile
>>> b/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/Makefile index 456efd1..628583b 100644
>>> --- a/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/Makefile +++
>>> b/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # $FreeBSD:
>>> src/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/Makefile,v 1.3 2011/04/09 09:07:31 uqs
>>> Exp $
>>>
>>> KMOD= dtraceall -SRCS= dtraceall.c opt_compat.h
>>> +SRCS= dtraceall.c opt_compat.h opt_nfs.h
>>>
>>> CFLAGS+= -I${.CURDIR}/../../..
>>>
>>
>> If you do cd sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall && make [obj depend] all, does
>> it compile OK with the above change?
>
> Depends on your expectations I guess. As neither NFS-related option gets
> defined, no dependency on either NFS module is registered. The compiler has
> no complaints, though.
Interesting. Could you repeat after sufficient cleaning up?
I am not sure where from opt_nfs.h file could come.
--
Andriy Gapon
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
