On 04/05/2012 07:06, John Baldwin wrote:
In this case we probably should become the upstream maintainer. My patch
actually bumps the version to 1.3 as it is sort of intended to do that.
bsd-pstack on SourceForge is dead. Sole project owner isn't responsive,
and as per SF policy they don't all
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:54:42AM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> On 04/05/2012 07:06, John Baldwin wrote:
> >In this case we probably should become the upstream maintainer. My patch
> >actually bumps the version to 1.3 as it is sort of intended to do that.
>
> bsd-pstack on SourceForge is dead. Sole proje
On 04/15/2012 02:30, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
It seems that the license is two-clause BSD.
My opinion is that such tool should be imported into the base.
I agree, this is the best option. This is a very low level tool,
somewhat similar to or extending procstat(1).
Yuri
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:00:08PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> On 04/15/2012 02:30, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > It seems that the license is two-clause BSD.
> > My opinion is that such tool should be imported into the base.
>
> I agree, this is the best option. This is a very low level tool,
> some
1. How to find in which core the given process is running?
2. How to force a process to run in a particular core? for example: I need to
run process ID 1200 in core 2.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
On 04/15/12 16:27, Mahesh Babu wrote:
1. How to find in which core the given process is running?
You can see it in top.
2. How to force a process to run in a particular core? for example: I need to
run process ID 1200 in core 2.
Use cpuset. You can either run it in the first place on core
The user-mode stack space is how many bytes, the kernel stack is how
many bytes. I've written a driver.I want to add it to the kernel
source. How should I do?
Thank you.
lichaozhong
2012-4-16
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
7 matches
Mail list logo
