On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:54:42AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > On 04/05/2012 07:06, John Baldwin wrote: > >In this case we probably should become the upstream maintainer. My patch > >actually bumps the version to 1.3 as it is sort of intended to do that. > > bsd-pstack on SourceForge is dead. Sole project owner isn't responsive, > and as per SF policy they don't allow anyone to take over such project. > They suggest to fork. > So will you object if I create a new project on SF, say bsd-pstack-new, > will import the current source and apply your patch and make a release? > I will also update pstack port so that it will become current. It seems that the license is two-clause BSD. My opinion is that such tool should be imported into the base.
pgpbsUd2J0Dvf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
