Hi Chris,
On Jun 17, 2011, at 18:40, Chris Rees wrote:
> Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files,
> in the same vein as the BINOWN variables I have introduced CONFOWN,
> CONFGRP, CONFMODE and CONFDIR.
>
> Please would someone review and give an opinion on [1]?
Shoul
On 19 June 2011 09:15, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Jun 17, 2011, at 18:40, Chris Rees wrote:
>> Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files,
>> in the same vein as the BINOWN variables I have introduced CONFOWN,
>> CONFGRP, CONFMODE and CONFDIR.
>>
>> P
On Jun 19, 2011, at 10:50, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 19 June 2011 09:15, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 17, 2011, at 18:40, Chris Rees wrote:
>>> Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files,
>>> in the same vein as the BINOWN variables I have introduced CONFOWN,
>
> CONFDIR is for base, not ports
Perhaps ${BASE_CONF_DIR}, ${PORTS_CONF_DIR}, ...
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd
On 19 June 2011 15:36, Dieter BSD wrote:
>> CONFDIR is for base, not ports
>
> Perhaps ${BASE_CONF_DIR}, ${PORTS_CONF_DIR}, ...
Have a look at the surrounding code, it matches the other variables
that we have always used.
Please don't let this become a bikeshed!
Chris
__
I appreciate that. The system works fine with NetBSD, LInux and Windows XP,
so I doubt its hardware.
Interesting though that OpenBSD has the same issue.
A question about the debug kernel load process: as it hangs on *
pci_print_verbose* in pci.c, can I deduce that this is the exact code
segment t
Perhaps some similar work here. And maybe a card vendor
with docs and an affinity to open source. Just news, that's all.
http://www.ntop.org/blog/pf_ring/introducing-the-10-gbit-pf_ring-dna-driver/
bcc: hackers, isp. reply to net.
___
freebsd-hackers@fr
7 matches
Mail list logo
