I am doing some automation stuff with freebsd.
on my local machine I am using Net::SSH::Expect (perl library) to run
commands on FreeBSD machine.
The problem is when I execute commands on FreeBSD, I am not able to get the
output of that command on my local machine.
All I am getting is remote shell
Hi! I am working on a piece of kernel software, that needs to use
publc key cryptography, especially RSA. As far as i know, no RSA
related in-kernel functionality is currently implemented. Writing a
new implementation of key management, and the algorithm itself, and
making it stable and efficent is
Hi! I am working on a piece of kernel software, that needs to use
publc key cryptography, especially RSA. As far as i know, no RSA
related in-kernel functionality is currently implemented. Writing a
new implementation of key management, and the algorithm itself, and
making it stable and efficent is
Quoting Robert Watson (from Sat, 12 Feb 2011
19:08:59 + (GMT)):
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:52:48 + (GMT) Robert Watson
wrote:
The one comment I'd make is that the MAC case should indicate that
"The MAC Framework" is supported, rather
Here is a patch that adds basic UTF-8 support to sh(1). This is enabled
if the locale is set appropriately.
Features:
* ${#var} counts codepoints. (Really, bytes with (b & 0xc0) != 0x80.)
* ?, [...] patterns match codepoints instead of bytes. They do not match
invalid sequences. This is so that
Hi RW,
Thanks alot for your reply.
Do you mean to say "curl" also not using a CONNECT to tunnel through to the
actual server?
How can I achieve downloading files HTTPS over a proxy?
Thanks
<%20http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers/42588>
-Chandra
> Hi All,
>
> I am workin
I promise to enable UFS quotas in GENERIC in one week unless anybody
objects
now.
Huh? I thought GENERIC was supposed to include everything you needed to
boot, not every possible feature that someone might desire?
But requests to include things required to boot get rejected and
nonessential
Actually, GENERIC is there to provide the most features for the most
uses. A large percentage of users don't config new kernels, and FreeBSD
has not elected the approach Digital Unix (aka "DUH") took about
installs which required a reconfig as one of the last steps of an
installation.
I can't
While I can understand some may want its not something we use on any of
our machines, and I suspect that's the case for many others.
Given adding it means the kernel will be doing extra work and hence a
drop in performance for a feature most will never use, I'm guessing here,
I would say just lea
On Feb 25, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> While I can understand some may want its not something we use on any of
> our machines, and I suspect that's the case for many others.
>
> Given adding it means the kernel will be doing extra work and hence a
> drop in performance...
Does any
10 matches
Mail list logo
