Quoting Robert Watson <[email protected]> (from Sat, 12 Feb 2011
19:08:59 +0000 (GMT)):
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:52:48 +0000 (GMT) Robert Watson
<[email protected]> wrote:
The one comment I'd make is that the MAC case should indicate that
"The MAC Framework" is supported, rather than mandatory access
controls being present -- the presence of the framework doesn't
imply the presence of mandatory access control policies.
Does
FEATURE(mac, "Mandatory Access Control Framework support");
look better?
Alternatively/additionally we could use mac_framework as the name
of the feature.
The above seems fine -- while I've been moving to names like
mac_framework.h, it's still "options MAC" and "security/mac", etc,
and think that "mac" is the most consistent options.
Committed.
If you want you can modify some userland applications to check for it
now with feature_present(3). When every feature macro of the GSoC
project is committed, I will commit a change to this function (being
able to administratively tell a feature is not there when it is
there), and a corresponding userland app to be able to use it in
scripts.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
One place where you're sure to find the perfect
driver is in the back seat.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
