Hi,
I'm currently trying to finish the R0 memory implementation[1] of FreeBSD for
VirtualBox. One of the missing methods allocates physical non contiguous pages
which don't need to have a kernel mapping (rtR0MemObjNativeAllocPhysNC). I'm
using vm_phys_alloc_contig to achieve this. The pages are
% fgrep 'Directory not empty' inkscape.txt
rmdir: /work/ports/devel/boost-libs/work: Directory not empty
rmdir: /work/ports/x11-toolkits/gtkmm24/work: Directory not empty
rmdir: /work/ports/devel/boehm-gc/work: Directory not empty
rmdir: /work/ports/math/gsl/work: Directory not empty
rmdir: /work/
jhell schrieb am 2010-03-01:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:54, alexbestms@ wrote:
> >Gary Jennejohn schrieb am 2010-02-28:
> >>On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:49:58 +0100 (CET)
> >>Alexander Best wrote:
> >>>how about something like this?
> >>Based on a quick look it seems OK to me.
> >>Have you tested it?
On 2010-03-01 14:34:50, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> % fgrep 'Directory not empty' inkscape.txt
> rmdir: /work/ports/devel/boost-libs/work: Directory not empty
> rmdir: /work/ports/x11-toolkits/gtkmm24/work: Directory not empty
> rmdir: /work/ports/devel/boehm-gc/work: Directory not empty
> rmdir:
xorquew...@googlemail.com writes:
> There's certainly no parallel building going on, but /work is nullfs
> mounted (from ZFS). Could this cause the above?
Not sure. Why are you using nullfs?
Can you show us the contents of those directories?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Alexander Eichner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently trying to finish the R0 memory implementation[1] of FreeBSD for
> VirtualBox. One of the missing methods allocates physical non contiguous
> pages which don't need to have a kernel mapping
> (rtR0MemObjNativeAlloc
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:58:29PM +, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On 2010-03-01 14:34:50, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > % fgrep 'Directory not empty' inkscape.txt
> > rmdir: /work/ports/devel/boost-libs/work: Directory not empty
> > ...
> > rmdir: /work/ports/x11-toolkits/pangomm/work:
Garrett Cooper schrieb am 2010-03-01:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:43 PM, jhell wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:19, alexbestms@ wrote:
> >> hi there,
> >> i always forget how to decipher model and family from the cpu id.
> >> of
> >> course
> >> there're 3rd party tools to do that for you, but
On 2010-03-01 15:10:16, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> xorquew...@googlemail.com writes:
> > There's certainly no parallel building going on, but /work is nullfs
> > mounted (from ZFS). Could this cause the above?
>
> Not sure. Why are you using nullfs?
Basically because "I don't know any better".
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:26:05 -0800
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> > i have a small test app to check {rm|mk}dir()'s errnos with certain args
> > like
> > /, ., /proc and non-empty dirs. i'll submit it to this thread as soon as i
> > also add tes
On Friday 26 February 2010 10:19:46 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i always forget how to decipher model and family from the cpu id. of course
> there're 3rd party tools to do that for you, but instead i decided to hack
the
> kernel. ;)
>
> maybe somebody finds these changes useful.
T
On Friday 26 February 2010 4:09:52 pm Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:21:05AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 February 2010 3:28:50 pm Juergen Lock wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50:10PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Before this get
xorquew...@googlemail.com writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > xorquew...@googlemail.com writes:
> > > There's certainly no parallel building going on, but /work is nullfs
> > > mounted (from ZFS). Could this cause the above?
> > Not sure. Why are you using nullfs?
> Basically because "I don
jhell schrieb am 2010-03-01:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:54, alexbestms@ wrote:
> >Gary Jennejohn schrieb am 2010-02-28:
> >>On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:49:58 +0100 (CET)
> >>Alexander Best wrote:
> >>>how about something like this?
> >>Based on a quick look it seems OK to me.
> >>Have you tested it?
'Lo,
Here's the current state of '/work':
http://coreland.ath.cx/tmp/work.txt
On 2010-03-01 20:08:45, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> That's begging the question... Clearly you're using nullfs because you
> need something done that you think nullfs can do for you. I'd like to
> know what that i
Hi,
I have an ALIX3d3 board and I'm looking for the audio driver for freebsd
8.0.
How do I get it running? Is there a new version of snd_amd5536.ko yet? where
can I get it?
All I need (at the moment) is playback.
thanks for letting me know.
-Mike
___
fr
jhell schrieb am 2010-03-01:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:54, alexbestms@ wrote:
> >Gary Jennejohn schrieb am 2010-02-28:
> >>On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:49:58 +0100 (CET)
> >>Alexander Best wrote:
> >>>how about something like this?
> >>Based on a quick look it seems OK to me.
> >>Have you tested it?
jhell schrieb am 2010-03-01:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:54, alexbestms@ wrote:
> >Gary Jennejohn schrieb am 2010-02-28:
> >>On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:49:58 +0100 (CET)
> >>Alexander Best wrote:
> >>>how about something like this?
> >>Based on a quick look it seems OK to me.
> >>Have you tested it?
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:52, alexbestms@ wrote:
oh. and btw: wouldn't it be reasonable to prevent a user shooting himself in
the foot if he has the brilliant idea of setting "MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX = /" ?
alex
Trying to match something like this is going to get out of control. Though
this is a nice
Hi,
I am looking at the code that allocates and frees kernel memory. I
understand that allocating kernel memory is quite different from
the user level mallocs. In case of user level mallocs, we allocate
requested size + 4 bytes and store the requested size in the
additional 4 bytes.
However,
I have a raidz setup as per the handbook but when I attempt to
"offline" a failing drive it will not let me:
kate# zpool status -c
invalid option 'c'
usage:
status [-vx] [pool] ...
kate# zpool status -v
pool: storage
state: ONLINE
scrub: resilver completed with 0 errors on Mon Mar 1 1
jhell schrieb am 2010-03-01:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:19, alexbestms@ wrote:
> >hi there,
> >i always forget how to decipher model and family from the cpu id.
> >of course
> >there're 3rd party tools to do that for you, but instead i decided
> >to hack the
> >kernel. ;)
> >maybe somebody finds t
jhell schrieb am 2010-03-01:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:54, alexbestms@ wrote:
> >Gary Jennejohn schrieb am 2010-02-28:
> >>On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:49:58 +0100 (CET)
> >>Alexander Best wrote:
> >>>how about something like this?
> >>Based on a quick look it seems OK to me.
> >>Have you tested it?
jhell schrieb am 2010-03-02:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:52, alexbestms@ wrote:
> >oh. and btw: wouldn't it be reasonable to prevent a user shooting
> >himself in
> >the foot if he has the brilliant idea of setting "MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX
> >= /" ?
> >alex
> Trying to match something like this is going
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:45, alexbestms@ wrote:
jhell schrieb am 2010-03-02:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:52, alexbestms@ wrote:
oh. and btw: wouldn't it be reasonable to prevent a user shooting
himself in
the foot if he has the brilliant idea of setting "MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX
= /" ?
alex
Trying to
jhell schrieb am 2010-03-02:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:45, alexbestms@ wrote:
> >jhell schrieb am 2010-03-02:
> >>On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:52, alexbestms@ wrote:
> >>>oh. and btw: wouldn't it be reasonable to prevent a user shooting
> >>>himself in
> >>>the foot if he has the brilliant idea of settin
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> jhell schrieb am 2010-03-02:
>
>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:45, alexbestms@ wrote:
>> >jhell schrieb am 2010-03-02:
>
>> >>On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:52, alexbestms@ wrote:
>
>> >>>oh. and btw: wouldn't it be reasonable to prevent a user shooting
>> >
Hi,
Found issues with sysctl mibs security.mac.biba.ptys_equal,
security.mac.lomac.ptys_equal, security.mac.mls.ptys_equal, not supporting
new /dev/pts terminal system in FreeBSD 8, proposed fix for issue.
When using a higher security grade/clearance with mac_mls it prevents
writing to the
In the last episode (Mar 01), Shrivatsan said:
> I am looking at the code that allocates and frees kernel memory. I
> understand that allocating kernel memory is quite different from the user
> level mallocs. In case of user level mallocs, we allocate requested size
> + 4 bytes and store the reque
In the last episode (Mar 01), Aryeh Friedman said:
> I have a raidz setup as per the handbook but when I attempt to "offline" a
> failing drive it will not let me:
>
> kate# zpool status -c
> invalid option 'c'
> usage:
> status [-vx] [pool] ...
> kate# zpool status -v
> pool: storage
>
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 01), Aryeh Friedman said:
I have a raidz setup as per the handbook but when I attempt to "offline" a
failing drive it will not let me:
kate# zpool status -c
invalid option 'c'
usage:
status [-vx] [pool] ...
kate# zpool status -v
pool: stor
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
i have a small test app to check {rm|mk}dir()'s errnos with certain args like
/, ., /proc and non-empty dirs. i'll submit it to this thread as soon as i
also add testcases for syscalls like rename
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:36:44PM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote:
> Hi,
> I wrote a module GEOM_ULZMA (such as GEOM_UZIP, but compression with lzma),
> [...]
Wouldn't it be better to modify geom_uzip to be universal decompression
class with various algorithms implemented as plugins?
This is basci
33 matches
Mail list logo
