Re: Usage of "files" for config

2008-10-28 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Srinivas, good day. Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:52:35AM +0530, Srinivas wrote: > I would like to know the usage of files and files.[arch] in sys/conf. > Basically, I didnt get the advantage of having a common file for > compilation(like files) rather than an individual Makefile in each > subdirectory.

Re: [Testers wanted] /dev/console cleanups

2008-10-28 Thread Ed Schouten
Hello Carlos, * Carlos A. M. dos Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The patched source builds and installs flawlessy. However I observed > something that seems to be a regression. If I run either xconsole or > xterm -C I only see kernel messages, even though my X startup (via > XDM) changes the o

Re: Usage of "files" for config

2008-10-28 Thread Srinivas
Eygene, Your reply is very helpful. Thank you very much. On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would like to know the usage of files and files.[arch] in sys/conf. >> Basically, I didnt get the advantage of having a common file for >> compilation(like fil

Re: Usage of "files" for config

2008-10-28 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 05:31:36 am Srinivas wrote: > Eygene, Your reply is very helpful. Thank you very much. > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I would like to know the usage of files and files.[arch] in sys/conf. > >> Basically, I didnt get

RTLD changes for non-native system (was: Re: Why does adding /usr/lib32 to LD_LIBRARY_PATH break 64-bit ?binaries?)

2008-10-28 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:18:10 +1030): On Tuesday 28 October 2008 01:31:16 M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Daniel O'Connor wrote: : > On Friday 24 October 2008 23:20:59