Eygene, Your reply is very helpful. Thank you very much. On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would like to know the usage of files and files.[arch] in sys/conf. >> Basically, I didnt get the advantage of having a common file for >> compilation(like files) rather than an individual Makefile in each >> subdirectory. > > 'files' and 'files.$ARCH' are the input directives for the config(8) > utility. Makefile is produced with the help of these files. The > rationale for having 'files' and 'files.$ARCH' is simple: there are > platform-specific directives and common directives.
Still, I didnt get the purpose of having a common "files" file for the kernel to generate Makefile. I am trying to understand the advantage of this approach with the conventional way of having a makefile for each sub-directory(device or module) and recurse from top of kernel with a configuration file dictating what features need to be included in the kernel. Thanks, Srinivas _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
