Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've seen that Fn key, but don't know what it is for. What? you press
> it, then follow with the integers [ 1, 2, 3 ... ]? At any rate, maybe
> you can remap the key with ~/.xmodmaprc.
They're used to access keys which won't physically fit on a laptop
ke
Ian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Re your original issue, can you get any mileage out of using acpi_ibm,
> devd and this post and/or the other one it references:
The laptop in question does not run FreeBSD. I gave up running FreeBSD
on any sort of desktop or laptop computer years ago.
DES
Hello All,
This is something I've been trying to figure out in the last couple of hours,
but can't seem to understand.
Sched_thread_priority() updates a threads priority to "prio". If the thread is
on the RUNQ, we have to pull it out and put it back at a different spot on the
same queue. Howeve
Hello:
I have some weird behavior I'm trying to figure out and was wondering
if someone can point me in the right direction. I'm running a FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE-amd64 machine. If I add /usr/lib32 to my LD_LIBRARY_PATH
it breaks all of my binaries on my 64-bit machine.
For example:
[EMAIL PROTECT
"Alexander Sack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have some weird behavior I'm trying to figure out and was wondering
> if someone can point me in the right direction. I'm running a FreeBSD
> 6.1-RELEASE-amd64 machine. If I add /usr/lib32 to my LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> it breaks all of my binaries on my
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you look at the rtld(1) man page, there are a number of environment
> variables you can set to debug the loader. I'm not sure how helpful
> they are, though.
You can rebuild rtld(1) with debugging enabled:
% cd /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf
% make
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If you look at the rtld(1) man page, there are a number of environment
>> variables you can set to debug the loader. I'm not sure how helpful
>> they are, though.
>
Alright, well I found some weirdness:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/lib:/usr/lib32:/usr/lib64
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# LD_DEBUG=1 ls
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 is initialized, base address = 0x800506000
RTLD dynamic = 0x80062ad78
RTLD pltgot = 0x0
processing main program's pr
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:48:47 -0400
> "Alexander Sack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, comments most appreciated. Damn, I was looking for someone to
>> go "a ha, you can't do this because" Alright, let me s
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:48:47 -0400
"Alexander Sack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, comments most appreciated. Damn, I was looking for someone to
> go "a ha, you can't do this because" Alright, let me see why rtld
> on 6.1-amd64 is picking up /usr/lib32 stuff for a native 64-bit binary
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Alexander Sack wrote:
Alright, well I found some weirdness:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/lib:/usr/lib32:/usr/lib64
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# LD_DEBUG=1 ls
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 is initialized, base address = 0x800506000
RTLD dynamic = 0x80062ad78
R
In the last episode (Oct 23), Alexander Sack said:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH is for native 64bit rtld. If you want a specific
> > path added for use by 32-bit ld-elf.so.1 only, use
> > LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH.
> >
> > Said that, y
12 matches
Mail list logo
