On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > The thing I am not sure about is how ioctl's would get mangled on
> > the way through.
>
> They get interpreted as linux ioctl, as they are handled by the
> linuxulator. You could try to write a wrapper there...
Yeah..
Maybe an FS approach would
I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as /mnt/camera
on /dev/da0s1.
Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
Now 'mount' command shows:
/dev/da0s1 on /mnt/camera (msdosfs, local)
'umount /dev/da0s1' command tells that device is not configured correctly.
'umo
Quoting Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 17 Dec 2007
16:26:58 +1030):
I am wondering if anyone has tried building such a beast?
ie a Lunux libusb that will be able to access devices in FreeBSD..
The reason I'd like it is that I want to use this
http://rmdir.de/~michael/xilinx/ i
Yuri wrote:
I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as /mnt/camera
on /dev/da0s1.
Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
I've understood that the only solution to this currently is "don't do
that then". :)
___
fre
Hi,
I am reading the code for boot0 (/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot0/boot0.S).
This is the part i am trying to understand:
/*
* Initialise segments and registers to known values.
* segments star
Hi
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:07:02AM -0800, Yuri wrote :
> I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as /mnt/camera
> on /dev/da0s1.
>
> Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
Personal recipe when this kind of things happens (generally caused by a
camera switc
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:16:02PM +0530, M.Girish Rao wrote:
> Whats the memory location of start?
I'm going off of memory of my old x86 days, so be kind to me. :-) By
the look of it, it's BOOT_BOOT0_ORG, which is 0x600. I'm basing this on
the flags passed to cc (actually ld) during linktime.
Quoting Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 17 Dec 2007
21:39:39 +1030):
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
AFAIR HPS' USB stack has linux compatibility, maybe you should ask
him / have a look at it.
I had a look at the code but I can't see any Linux related code.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:58:27AM -0600, Sergey Babkin wrote :
> Would not umount -f do the trick?
I tried it without particular care one time on a failing device and
experienced an instant system reboot (was it caused by the faulty disk
or by a limitation in the implementation of the system (Fre
>
>On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:07:02AM -0800, Yuri wrote :
>> I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as
>> /mnt/camera
>> on /dev/da0s1.
>>
>> Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
>
>Personal recipe when this kind of things happens (generally caused by a
>ca
On 2007-12-17, Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Some "got hung in unmount" issues are to be sorted out (these
>appeared on Linux, and they might or might not appear on FreeBSD).
>
>
> IIRC you are saying that any user could make umount hang. And you said
> this is an unintended
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:41:16 +0100
Csaba Henk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [This message has also been posted to gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers.]
> On 2007-12-17, Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > - Some "got hung in unmount" issues are to be sorted out (these
> >appeared on
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:07:02AM -0800, Yuri wrote:
>I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as /mnt/camera
>on /dev/da0s1.
>
>Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
This triggers known and extremely painful to fix bugs in FreeBSD.
Your best work-around is to
> I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as
> /mnt/camera
> on /dev/da0s1.
>
> Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
I submitted this late at night. Now in the morning another solution
came to my mind. I thought I will find it in replies but I didn't.
In ca
Kip Macy wrote:
he's just plain misinforme
Until we know what he is referring to we can't actually say that.
-Kip
OK he said I could post from our private email so here goes. There were
bits in and around relating to the
Solaris /dev/poll support (and the mechanism's limitations) which I
On Dec 17, 2007 1:25 PM, James Mansion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kip Macy wrote:
> >> he's just plain misinforme
> > Until we know what he is referring to we can't actually say that.
> > -Kip
> >
>
> OK he said I could post from our private email so here goes. There were
> bits in and around r
On Friday 07 December 2007 06:23:51 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:43:00AM +0100, Gerald Heinig wrote:
> > Hi Sonja,
> >
> > > Hi everyone.
> > >
> > > I'm working on a kernel module that needs to maintain a large
> > structure
> > > in memory. As this structure could grow
Kip Macy wrote:
Do you have a set of regression tests for libev? It sounds like they
would worth having to regression test kqueue.
I would have thought that libevent and libev should both the checked
against kqueue. Also APR
and everything else that has support. I'm not the author of libev
On 18/12/2007 5:09 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:07:02AM -0800, Yuri wrote:
I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as /mnt/camera
on /dev/da0s1.
Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
This triggers known and extremely painful to fix b
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:32:48AM -0800, Yuri wrote :
> In case of USB device (which device in question in this problem
> happens to be) usbd can be used to mount it.
>
> If attach/detach events trigger mount/unmount commands this problem
> shouldn't exist. I didn't try though.
The problem is th
Hi Antony,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:36:19AM +1100, Antony Mawer wrote :
> Every time this comes up it's branded with the "really hard to fix"
> message, but I seem to recall the last time this came up Matt Dillon
> chimed in and said he'd managed to fix it in Dragonfly without too
> much pain.
>
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:26:58 +1030 "Daniel O'Connor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am wondering if anyone has tried building such a beast?
> > ie a Lunux libusb that will be able to access devices in FreeBSD..
>
> Well, the devel/libusb port builds out o
Hi,
i run command for kernel profiling purpose:
pmcstat -S instructions -O /tmp/sample.out
and i get error:
pmcstat: ERROR: Initialization of the pmc(3) library failed: No such file
or directory
I've compile my FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE kernel in i386 machine :
device hwpmc
options HWPMC_HOOKS
Check ports 'cpuid' -
Vendor ID: "GenuineIntel"; CPUID level 10
Intel-specific functions:
Version 06f6:
Type 0 - Original OEM
Family 6 - Pentium Pro
Model 15 -
Extended model 0
Stepping 6
Reserved 0
Odds are you have a post-P4 Intel processor.
-Kip
On Dec 17, 2007 7:47 PM, binto <[EMAIL
check with cpuid:
Vendor ID: "GenuineIntel"; CPUID level 10
Intel-specific functions:
Version 06f7:
Type 0 - Original OEM
Family 6 - Pentium Pro
Model 15 -
Extended model 0
Stepping 7
Reserved 0
Extended brand string: "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5335 @ 2.00GHz"
CLFLUSH instruction cach
25 matches
Mail list logo
