On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 05:47:19PM +0100, Laurent Frigault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are experiencing a problem with BCM5721 bge interfaces, which seems to
> be able to receive at almost 1Gbps but can only transmit at < 540Mbps.
>
> It is the exactly same problem describes at
> http://lists.freebsd.org
Alexander Leidinger ha scritto:
To achieve this goal we have 2 possibilities, either we install
everything into LINUXBASE and install a wrapper in LOCALBASE, or we
install everything in a safe location in LOCALBASE. The first part
requires that the maintainers of the linux program play some tri
Quoting Alex Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:52:15 +0100):
Alexander Leidinger ha scritto:
To achieve this goal we have 2 possibilities, either we install
everything into LINUXBASE and install a wrapper in LOCALBASE, or we
install everything in a safe location in LOCALB
hi
iam use nc on FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT
trouble in -t(timeout) option, absentia full break session (very need)
examples:
# time nc -w 1 -z 192.168.44.14 443
real1m15.002s
user0m0.001s
sys 0m0.003s
# time nc -w 1 -z google.com 80
Connection to google.com 80 port [tcp/http] succeeded!
Alex Dupre wrote:
Alexander Leidinger ha scritto:
To achieve this goal we have 2 possibilities, either we install
everything into LINUXBASE and install a wrapper in LOCALBASE, or we
install everything in a safe location in LOCALBASE. The first part
requires that the maintainers of the linux pr
Chuck Robey wrote:
> I guess I might be wrong, but I have to say, wrapping everything really
> does seem to me to be the hack.
Call it a wrapper, call it a symlink, but it seems to me that you don't
like linux libs in LOCALBASE *and* you don't like executable references
in LOCALBASE (and these are
6 matches
Mail list logo