Chuck Robey wrote: > I guess I might be wrong, but I have to say, wrapping everything really > does seem to me to be the hack.
Call it a wrapper, call it a symlink, but it seems to me that you don't like linux libs in LOCALBASE *and* you don't like executable references in LOCALBASE (and these are the only two possibilities exposed by Alexander). I prefer the wrapper/symlink, because I think all linux stuff should be in /compat/linux. What do you propose, instead? -- Alex Dupre _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
