On 11/20/07, Thierry Herbelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Tuesday 20 November 2007, Ari Suutari a écrit :
>
> > I have Promise TX2 (PDC20575). It didn't work with 7.0 betas
> > before, but with this patch things run as well as they did
> > on 6.x.
> >
> > Ari S.
>
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone a
Hi,
On man, nov 19, 2007 at 09:02:33 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
Hi All!
I'd like to get the final verdict of the attached patch and if it fixes
the problem or not.
Please test and report, its a bit urgent if it need to get into R7 :)
I have Promise TX2 (PDC20575). It didn't work with
Le Tuesday 20 November 2007, Ari Suutari a écrit :
> I have Promise TX2 (PDC20575). It didn't work with 7.0 betas
> before, but with this patch things run as well as they did
> on 6.x.
>
> Ari S.
Hello,
Has anyone an idea why the Promise controllers seemed to work correctly under
6.x, then
Joao Barros wrote:
On 11/20/07, Thierry Herbelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Tuesday 20 November 2007, Ari Suutari a écrit :
I have Promise TX2 (PDC20575). It didn't work with 7.0 betas
before, but with this patch things run as well as they did
on 6.x.
Ari S.
Hello,
Ha
Hi,
I am also interested about the IPv6 enabled jail
Best Regards,
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Jan Knepp
Robert Watson wrote:
> The main missing feature right now, from my perspective, is signal
> information, but are there other pieces of detailed process information we
> could usefully be displaying? I'm not sure I want to get into teaching
> procinfo about generating stack traces, which is some
6 matches
Mail list logo
